Henry James A
VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.
Ears Gone Wrong®, LLC, Oregon City, Oregon.
Semin Hear. 2025 Mar 7;45(3-04):255-275. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804509. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Clinical services for tinnitus have expanded greatly since the "masking" method was introduced by Jack Vernon in the 1970s. According to PubMed, the number of peer-reviewed publications has increased dramatically since that time (seven with "tinnitus" in the title in 1975; 477 in 2023). With so much research and overall interest, it might be expected that tinnitus services have improved accordingly. In reality, there are many variations of treatment, but no one method has been shown to be more effective than any other. This diversity of methods is evident when researching "tinnitus" on the internet and considering the many different ways clinicians offer tinnitus services. Some offer an evidence-based method but may not have the competency to ensure fidelity. Further is the proliferation of commercial methods that can cost thousands of dollars. In this article, I propose a framework for providing tinnitus clinical services called Tinnitus Stepped-Care. This framework does not promote specific procedures for tinnitus assessment and treatment, but rather suggests guiding principles that are essential in each of six progressive steps of tinnitus clinical care. It is further proposed to test the stepped-care model in the (currently under development) Tinnitus Learning Health Network (TLHN). The TLHN would consist of a network of clinicians, patients, and researchers from around the world who collaborate in establishing "best tinnitus practices." Collaboration would involve using and sharing data for the ongoing monitoring of a large, diverse, well-described patient population, and using quality improvement science to test and monitor outcomes over time, to determine the most effective treatments for different subgroups of tinnitus patients.
自20世纪70年代杰克·弗农引入“掩蔽”方法以来,耳鸣的临床服务有了极大的扩展。根据PubMed的数据,自那时起,同行评审出版物的数量急剧增加(1975年标题中含有“耳鸣”的有7篇;2023年有477篇)。有了如此多的研究和总体关注度,人们可能会期望耳鸣服务也相应得到了改善。实际上,治疗方法有很多种,但没有一种方法被证明比其他方法更有效。在互联网上搜索“耳鸣”并考虑临床医生提供耳鸣服务的多种不同方式时,这种方法的多样性就很明显了。有些提供基于证据的方法,但可能没有能力确保其准确性。更有甚者,还有一些商业方法大量涌现,可能要花费数千美元。在本文中,我提出了一个名为耳鸣分级护理的提供耳鸣临床服务的框架。这个框架并不推广耳鸣评估和治疗的具体程序,而是提出了在耳鸣临床护理的六个递进步骤中每一步都至关重要的指导原则。还建议在(目前正在开发的)耳鸣学习健康网络(TLHN)中测试分级护理模式。TLHN将由来自世界各地的临床医生、患者和研究人员组成的网络构成,他们合作建立“最佳耳鸣治疗实践”。合作将包括使用和共享数据,以便对大量、多样且描述详细的患者群体进行持续监测,并使用质量改进科学来长期测试和监测结果,以确定针对不同亚组耳鸣患者的最有效治疗方法。