Hendry P J, Anstadt M P, Plunkett M D, Pacifico A D, Mikat E M, Menius J A, Lowe J E
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 22170.
Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5 Suppl):IV306-12.
The ideal method for the preservation of donor hearts for transplantation is unclear. To assess the optimal temperature for donor myocardium preservation, the recovery of isolated canine hearts (n = 20) exposed to 4 hours of either standard ice-chest hypothermia (0-4 degrees C) or constant moderate hypothermia (12 degrees C) were compared. Functional and metabolic data were acquired before hypothermia and every 30 minutes during 3 hours of reperfusion with oxygenated blood. Mean end-systolic pressure-volume slopes were 2.11 +/- 0.06 and 2.09 +/- 0.06 mm Hg/ml for ice-chest hypothermia and constant moderate hypothermia, respectively (p = NS), which were unchanged from control. All y intercepts during reperfusion were decreased compared with control (p = 0.002) without any differences between groups. End-diastolic pressures were greater than control throughout the reperfusion period for both groups (p = 0.02), but there was a difference in change of end-diastolic pressures with time between groups (p = 0.04). Dry/wet ratios were similar after preservation and reperfusion in both groups. ATP recovered to control levels during reperfusion for both groups although energy charge ratios were greater for hearts exposed to constant moderate hypothermia (p = 0.007). These data indicate that intracellular energy stores are well maintained by preservation using either technique. Changes in function appear to be related to altered compliance irrespective of preservation temperature. These data suggest that a wide range of temperatures may be acceptable for donor heart preservation.
目前尚不清楚保存供体心脏用于移植的理想方法。为了评估供体心肌保存的最佳温度,比较了20只离体犬心脏在标准冰盒低温(0 - 4摄氏度)或持续中度低温(12摄氏度)下暴露4小时后的恢复情况。在低温处理前以及用含氧血液再灌注3小时期间,每隔30分钟获取功能和代谢数据。冰盒低温组和持续中度低温组的平均收缩末期压力 - 容积斜率分别为2.11±0.06和2.09±0.06 mmHg/ml(p = 无显著差异),与对照组相比无变化。再灌注期间所有的y轴截距与对照组相比均降低(p = 0.002),两组之间无差异。两组在整个再灌注期间的舒张末期压力均高于对照组(p = 0.02),但两组舒张末期压力随时间的变化存在差异(p = 0.04)。两组在保存和再灌注后的干/湿比相似。两组在再灌注期间ATP均恢复到对照水平,尽管持续中度低温处理的心脏能量电荷比更高(p = 0.007)。这些数据表明,两种技术保存均可良好维持细胞内能量储备。功能变化似乎与顺应性改变有关,与保存温度无关。这些数据表明,供体心脏保存可以接受较宽的温度范围。