Rappaport M, Hemmerle A V, Rappaport M L
U.C. Brain Function Study Unit, Agnews Developmental Center, San Jose, CA 95134.
Clin Electroencephalogr. 1990 Oct;21(4):188-91. doi: 10.1177/155005949002100406.
Intermediate (0-60 ms) and long latency (0-500 ms) somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) patterns were compared in terms of their relationship to degree of clinical disability in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Long latency (LL) SEP patterns correlated significantly with clinical disability as measured by the Disability Rating scale while intermediate latency (IL) SEP patterns did not. Evoked potential abnormality (EPA) scores based upon LL SEP patterns appear better able to reflect extent and severity of brain dysfunction and overall clinical condition than do IL SEP patterns for severe traumatic brain injury patients.
对重度创伤性脑损伤患者的中间潜伏期（0 - 60毫秒）和长潜伏期（0 - 500毫秒）体感诱发电位（SEP）模式与其临床残疾程度的关系进行了比较。长潜伏期（LL）SEP模式与通过残疾评定量表测量的临床残疾显著相关，而中间潜伏期（IL）SEP模式则不然。对于重度创伤性脑损伤患者，基于LL SEP模式的诱发电位异常（EPA）评分似乎比IL SEP模式更能反映脑功能障碍的程度和严重程度以及整体临床状况。
