Valenza Marie Carmen, Castro-Martín Eduardo, Valenza Gerad, Guirao-Piñeiro Miguel, De-la-Llave-Rincón Ana Isabel, Fernández-de-las-Peñas César
Department of Physical Therapy, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Feb;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
The curricula of all health professionals have an important foundation of human anatomy. A comparison of the anatomy retention between students from different curricula has not been studied. Our aim was to examine the knowledge competency of third-year physical therapy and medical students in carpal bone anatomy.
The testing was conducted on the third-year medical and physical therapy students at Universidad de Granada. Students were given 5 minutes to answer the carpal bone test, a test which requires the identification of the carpal bones in an illustration of the bony skeleton of carpal region. Differences in the distribution of the responses between groups were analyzed using the χ(2) test.
One hundred thirty-four (n = 134) tests were analyzed (n = 54 [41%] physical therapy students, n = 80 [59%] medical students). Only 39 students correctly identified all of the carpal bones (42.6% physical therapy, 20% medical, P < .001). Physical therapy students correctly identified a greater number (P < .001) of carpal bones (mean ± SD, 5.8 ± 2.2) than medical students (mean ± SD, 3.1 ± 2.9). The capitate was the most frequently identified bone in both physical therapy (96%) and medical (46%) students (P < .001). The hamate bone was the least frequently identified bone by medical students (n = 29, or 36.3%), whereas the trapezoid bone was the least frequently identified bone by physical therapy students (n = 35, or 64.8%).
There are few studies investigating anatomical knowledge levels between disciplines. This study found that physical therapy students exhibited better retention of anatomy of the carpal bones than medical students.
所有健康专业人员的课程都有重要的人体解剖学基础。不同课程的学生之间解剖学知识保留情况的比较尚未得到研究。我们的目的是检验三年级物理治疗专业和医学专业学生在腕骨解剖学方面的知识能力。
测试在格拉纳达大学的三年级医学和物理治疗专业学生中进行。学生有5分钟时间回答腕骨测试题,该测试要求在腕部骨骼区域的图示中识别腕骨。使用χ(2)检验分析两组之间回答分布的差异。
共分析了134份测试(n = 54 [41%] 物理治疗专业学生,n = 80 [59%] 医学专业学生)。只有39名学生正确识别了所有腕骨(物理治疗专业学生占42.6%,医学专业学生占20%,P < .001)。物理治疗专业学生正确识别的腕骨数量(P < .001)(均值±标准差,5.8 ± 2.2)比医学专业学生(均值±标准差,3.1 ± 2.9)多。头状骨是物理治疗专业学生(96%)和医学专业学生(46%)中最常被识别出的骨头(P < .001)。钩骨是医学专业学生中最不常被识别出的骨头(n = 29,即36.3%),而大多角骨是物理治疗专业学生中最不常被识别出的骨头(n = 35,即64.8%)。
很少有研究调查不同学科之间的解剖学知识水平。本研究发现,物理治疗专业学生在腕骨解剖学知识的保留方面表现优于医学专业学生。