• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用腕骨测试比较医学三年级学生和物理治疗专业学生的解剖学知识

Comparison of third-year medical and physical therapy students' knowledge of anatomy using the carpal bone test.

作者信息

Valenza Marie Carmen, Castro-Martín Eduardo, Valenza Gerad, Guirao-Piñeiro Miguel, De-la-Llave-Rincón Ana Isabel, Fernández-de-las-Peñas César

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Universidad de Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Feb;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.005
PMID:22257944
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The curricula of all health professionals have an important foundation of human anatomy. A comparison of the anatomy retention between students from different curricula has not been studied. Our aim was to examine the knowledge competency of third-year physical therapy and medical students in carpal bone anatomy.

METHODS

The testing was conducted on the third-year medical and physical therapy students at Universidad de Granada. Students were given 5 minutes to answer the carpal bone test, a test which requires the identification of the carpal bones in an illustration of the bony skeleton of carpal region. Differences in the distribution of the responses between groups were analyzed using the χ(2) test.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four (n = 134) tests were analyzed (n = 54 [41%] physical therapy students, n = 80 [59%] medical students). Only 39 students correctly identified all of the carpal bones (42.6% physical therapy, 20% medical, P < .001). Physical therapy students correctly identified a greater number (P < .001) of carpal bones (mean ± SD, 5.8 ± 2.2) than medical students (mean ± SD, 3.1 ± 2.9). The capitate was the most frequently identified bone in both physical therapy (96%) and medical (46%) students (P < .001). The hamate bone was the least frequently identified bone by medical students (n = 29, or 36.3%), whereas the trapezoid bone was the least frequently identified bone by physical therapy students (n = 35, or 64.8%).

CONCLUSION

There are few studies investigating anatomical knowledge levels between disciplines. This study found that physical therapy students exhibited better retention of anatomy of the carpal bones than medical students.

摘要

目的

所有健康专业人员的课程都有重要的人体解剖学基础。不同课程的学生之间解剖学知识保留情况的比较尚未得到研究。我们的目的是检验三年级物理治疗专业和医学专业学生在腕骨解剖学方面的知识能力。

方法

测试在格拉纳达大学的三年级医学和物理治疗专业学生中进行。学生有5分钟时间回答腕骨测试题,该测试要求在腕部骨骼区域的图示中识别腕骨。使用χ(2)检验分析两组之间回答分布的差异。

结果

共分析了134份测试(n = 54 [41%] 物理治疗专业学生,n = 80 [59%] 医学专业学生)。只有39名学生正确识别了所有腕骨(物理治疗专业学生占42.6%,医学专业学生占20%,P < .001)。物理治疗专业学生正确识别的腕骨数量(P < .001)(均值±标准差,5.8 ± 2.2)比医学专业学生(均值±标准差,3.1 ± 2.9)多。头状骨是物理治疗专业学生(96%)和医学专业学生(46%)中最常被识别出的骨头(P < .001)。钩骨是医学专业学生中最不常被识别出的骨头(n = 29,即36.3%),而大多角骨是物理治疗专业学生中最不常被识别出的骨头(n = 35,即64.8%)。

结论

很少有研究调查不同学科之间的解剖学知识水平。本研究发现,物理治疗专业学生在腕骨解剖学知识的保留方面表现优于医学专业学生。

相似文献

1
Comparison of third-year medical and physical therapy students' knowledge of anatomy using the carpal bone test.使用腕骨测试比较医学三年级学生和物理治疗专业学生的解剖学知识
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Feb;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
2
A preliminary assessment of the fifth-year chiropractic students' knowledge of anatomy.五年制脊椎按摩疗法专业学生解剖学知识的初步评估。
J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):63-6. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0157.
3
Factors influencing student performance on the carpal bone test as a preliminary evaluation of anatomical knowledge retention.作为解剖学知识掌握情况的初步评估,影响学生腕骨测试成绩的因素。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):133-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.1464. Epub 2014 May 16.
4
The carpal bones: a basic test of medical students' and junior doctors' knowledge of anatomy.腕骨:对医学生和初级医生解剖学知识的一项基础测试。
Surgeon. 2005 Aug;3(4):257-9. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80087-3.
5
A Comparison of Fourth-Year Health Sciences Students' Knowledge of Gross Lower and Upper Limb Anatomy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(6):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
The weak relationship between anatomy competence and clinical skills in junior medical students.低年级医学生的解剖学能力与临床技能之间的弱关系。
Anat Sci Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;5(4):217-24. doi: 10.1002/ase.1272. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
7
Integrating physical examination and trunk anatomy; a new course for second year medical students.整合体格检查与躯干解剖学;面向医学二年级学生的一门新课程。
Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):975-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701589219.
8
Integration of geriatrics into a spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in Pakistan: evaluation and feedback of third-year medical students.巴基斯坦将老年医学纳入本科医学螺旋式课程:三年级医学生的评估与反馈
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):622. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?学生对临床解剖学有足够的了解吗?
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02096.x.
10
How much anatomy is enough?多少解剖学知识才算足够?
Anat Sci Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;1(4):184-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.35.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunology knowledge as one of the basic sciences that forms the foundations to developing sound clinicians.免疫学知识作为基础科学之一,是培养优秀临床医生的基础。
J Chiropr Educ. 2016 Oct;30(2):108-113. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-12. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
2
The tarsal bone test: a basic test of health sciences students' knowledge of lower limb anatomy.跗骨测试:一项针对健康科学专业学生下肢解剖学知识的基础测试。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:939163. doi: 10.1155/2014/939163. Epub 2014 Jul 8.