Department of Anaesthesia, Hôpital Foch, Université of Versailles SQY (UniverSud Paris), 40 rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):638-43. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer457. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Manufacturers recommend maintaining anaesthesia at a bispectral index (BIS) or state entropy (SE) index value between 40 and 60.
We prospectively studied 102 patients receiving propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia administered by anaesthetists blinded to these indices. The main endpoint was crude agreement (P(0)), defined as the proportion of agreement between BIS and SE index among three categories: <40, between 40 and 60, and >60. Discrepancies in recommendation (DR) were also considered. A DR is type 1 if BIS or SE is <40, while the other is simultaneously >60. A DR is type 2 when BIS and SE index values are on different sides of a threshold (40 or 60) with three subtypes according to the magnitude of their difference. A linear multiple regression was performed to identify covariates that are independently associated with P(0).
In total, 12 147 pairs of values were studied. P(0) was 59.9 (24.5%) [mean (sd)]. Thirty-three patients presented more than 50% discordant pairs and only seven patients presented more than 95% concordant pairs. Type 1 DR occurred in only 1.1% of all the pairs. The median (inter-quartile range) number of type 2 DR varied from 5 (3-8) to 2 (1-3) according to the degree of difference. Multivariate analysis showed that age (P=0.0004) and electrode position (P=0.0084) were independently associated with P(0). An increase in the age of 10 yr decreases P(0) by 5%.
The agreement between BIS and SE indices is moderate and deteriorates as patients' age increases. This study cannot determine which index is best adapted for elderly patients. Additional work comparing both indices with raw EEG traces is warranted.
制造商建议将麻醉维持在双频谱指数(BIS)或状态熵(SE)指数值在 40 到 60 之间。
我们前瞻性研究了 102 例接受异丙酚-舒芬太尼麻醉的患者,麻醉师对这些指数不知情。主要终点是粗一致性(P(0)),定义为 BIS 和 SE 指数在三个类别之间的一致性比例:<40、40 到 60 之间和>60。还考虑了推荐的差异(DR)。如果 BIS 或 SE <40,则 DR 为 1 型,而另一个同时>60。当 BIS 和 SE 指数值在阈值(40 或 60)的两侧时,DR 为 2 型,根据其差异的大小有三个亚类。进行线性多重回归分析以确定与 P(0)独立相关的协变量。
共研究了 12147 对值。P(0)为 59.9(24.5%)[平均值(标准差)]。33 例患者有超过 50%的不匹配对,只有 7 例患者有超过 95%的匹配对。所有对中仅发生 1.1%的 1 型 DR。根据差异程度,2 型 DR 的中位数(四分位距)数量从 5(3-8)到 2(1-3)不等。多变量分析显示,年龄(P=0.0004)和电极位置(P=0.0084)与 P(0)独立相关。年龄每增加 10 岁,P(0)降低 5%。
BIS 和 SE 指数之间的一致性是中等的,并且随着患者年龄的增加而恶化。本研究无法确定哪个指数最适合老年患者。需要进一步的工作来比较这两个指数与原始 EEG 轨迹。