Ebensperger Max, Kreuzer Matthias, Kratzer Stephan, Schneider Gerhard, Schwerin Stefan
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;134(4):1077-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.050. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
The GE Entropy™ module uses frontal EEG to compute the processed indices state entropy (SE), response entropy (RE), and burst suppression ratio (BSR) to guide maintenance of anaesthesia by supposedly minimising overly 'deep' or 'light' anaesthesia. It remains unclear whether the manufacturer-recommended index ranges accurately reflect anaesthesia levels or prevent complications such as burst suppression or arousal reactions.
We retrospectively analysed 15 608 patient records, evaluating 14 770 adult patients (18-90 yr old) undergoing general anaesthesia. Age-dependent effects on processed index values were assessed using linear regression and Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho).
During steady-state anaesthesia (BSR=0), only 38.4% (32.5-42.4%) of SE values were within the recommended range, with most values below the target. Age was positively associated with an increase in age-adjusted minimal alveolar concentration for volatile anaesthetics (adjusted [adj.] R=0.18, P<0.001, rho=0.47 [0.20-0.70]). Despite this, SE paradoxically increased with age (adj. R=0.45, P<0.001, rho=0.67 [0.51-0.79]). This trend persisted even during periods with positive BSR despite supposedly adequate SE values (adj. R=0.73, P<0.001, rho=0.90 [0.80-0.95]). Maintaining anaesthesia within the recommended index range did not prevent positive BSR. Additionally, both frequency (adj. R=0.70, P<0.001, rho=0.92 [0.85-0.95]) and duration (adj. R=0.73, P<0.001, rho=0.89 [0.82-0.93]) of ΔRE-SE≥10, indicating arousal, increased with age.
Despite their intuitive appeal, the processed EEG index values SE, RE, ΔRE-SE, and BSR showed limited reliability in guiding maintenance of anaesthesia, especially in older patients. Anaesthesiologists should not rely exclusively on the recommended index value range, as it is often unattainable and does not prevent burst suppression or arousal indicators.
GE熵模块使用额部脑电图来计算处理后的指标,即状态熵(SE)、反应熵(RE)和爆发抑制率(BSR),以通过假定将过度“深”或“浅”麻醉降至最低来指导麻醉维持。目前尚不清楚制造商推荐的指标范围是否能准确反映麻醉水平或预防诸如爆发抑制或觉醒反应等并发症。
我们回顾性分析了15608份患者记录,评估了14770例接受全身麻醉的成年患者(18 - 90岁)。使用线性回归和Spearman相关系数(rho)评估年龄对处理后指标值的影响。
在稳态麻醉期间(BSR = 0),仅38.4%(32.5 - 42.4%)的SE值在推荐范围内,大多数值低于目标值。年龄与挥发性麻醉剂的年龄校正最小肺泡浓度增加呈正相关(校正后[adj.]R = 0.18,P < 0.001,rho = 0.47 [0.20 - 0.70])。尽管如此,SE却随年龄呈反常增加(adj. R = 0.45,P < 0.001,rho = 0.67 [0.51 - 0.79])。即使在BSR为正值的期间,尽管SE值据推测足够,这种趋势仍持续存在(adj. R = 0.73,P < 0.001,rho = 0.90 [0.80 - 0.95])。将麻醉维持在推荐指标范围内并不能预防阳性BSR。此外,表明觉醒的ΔRE - SE≥10的频率(adj. R = 0.70,P < 0.001,rho = 0.92 [0.85 - 0.95])和持续时间(adj. R = 0.73,P < 0.001,rho = 0.89 [0.82 - 0.93])均随年龄增加。
尽管处理后的脑电图指标值SE、RE、ΔRE - SE和BSR具有直观吸引力,但在指导麻醉维持方面显示出有限的可靠性,尤其是在老年患者中。麻醉医生不应仅依赖推荐的指标值范围,因为该范围往往无法达到,且不能预防爆发抑制或觉醒指标。