Suppr超能文献

高频喷射通气叠加与常规喷射通气在喉科手术中的比较。

Comparison of superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation with conventional jet ventilation for laryngeal surgery.

机构信息

Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 1, Entrance 70, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):690-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer460. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New ventilators have simplified the use of supraglottic superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV(SG)), but it has not been systematically compared with other modes of jet ventilation (JV) in humans. We sought to investigate whether SHFJV(SG) would provide more effective ventilation compared with single-frequency JV techniques.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients undergoing minor laryngeal surgery under general anaesthesia were included. In each patient, four different JV techniques were applied in random order for 10-min periods: SHFJV(SG), supraglottic normal frequency (NFJV(SG)), supraglottic high frequency (HFJV(SG)), and infraglottic high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV(IG)). Chest wall volume variations were continuously measured with opto-electronic plethysmography (OEP), intratracheal pressure was recorded and blood gases were measured.

RESULTS

Chest wall volumes were normalized to NFJV(SG) end-expiratory level. The increase in end-expiratory chest wall volume (EEV(CW)) was 239 (196) ml during SHFJV(SG) (P<0.05 compared with NFJV(SG)). EEV(CW) was 148 (145) and 44 (106) ml during HFJV(SG) and HFJV(IG), respectively (P<0.05 compared with SHFJV(SG)). Tidal volume (V(T)) during SHFJV(SG) was 269 (149) ml. V(T) was 229 (169) ml (P=1.00 compared with SHFJV(SG)), 145 (50) ml (P<0.05), and 110 (33) ml (P<0.01) during NFJV(SG), HFJV(SG), and HFJV(IG), respectively. Intratracheal pressures corresponded well to changes in both EEV(CW) and V(T). All JV modes resulted in adequate oxygenation. However, was lowest during HFJV(SG) [4.3 (1.3) kPa; P<0.01 compared with SHFJV(SG)].

CONCLUSION

SHFJV(SG) was associated with increased EEV(CW) and V(T) compared with the three other investigated JV modes. All four modes provided adequate ventilation and oxygenation, and thus can be used for uncomplicated laryngeal surgery in healthy patients with limited airway obstruction.

摘要

背景

新型呼吸机简化了声门上高频喷射通气(SHFJV(SG))的使用,但尚未在人体中对其与其他喷射通气(JV)模式进行系统比较。我们试图研究 SHFJV(SG)是否比单频 JV 技术提供更有效的通气。

方法

共纳入 16 例在全身麻醉下接受小喉部手术的患者。在每位患者中,以随机顺序应用四种不同的 JV 技术 10 分钟:SHFJV(SG)、声门上常规频率(NFJV(SG))、声门上高频(HFJV(SG))和气管内高频喷射通气(HFJV(IG))。采用光电子体积描记法(OEP)连续测量胸壁容量变化,记录气管内压并测量血气。

结果

将胸壁体积归一化为 NFJV(SG)的呼气末水平。SHFJV(SG)时呼气末胸壁体积(EEV(CW))增加 239(196)ml(与 NFJV(SG)相比,P<0.05)。HFJV(SG)和 HFJV(IG)时的 EEV(CW)分别为 148(145)和 44(106)ml(与 SHFJV(SG)相比,P<0.05)。SHFJV(SG)时潮气量(V(T))为 269(149)ml。V(T)在 NFJV(SG)、HFJV(SG)和 HFJV(IG)时分别为 229(169)ml(与 SHFJV(SG)相比,P=1.00)、145(50)ml(与 SHFJV(SG)相比,P<0.05)和 110(33)ml(与 SHFJV(SG)相比,P<0.01)。气管内压与 EEV(CW)和 V(T)的变化相符。所有 JV 模式均能充分氧合。然而,HFJV(SG)时最低[4.3(1.3)kPa;与 SHFJV(SG)相比,P<0.01]。

结论

与其他三种研究中的 JV 模式相比,SHFJV(SG)与增加的 EEV(CW)和 V(T)相关。四种模式均提供充足的通气和氧合,因此可用于气道阻塞有限的健康患者的简单喉部手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验