Suppr超能文献

经黏膜下内镜安全瓣(SEMF)技术的内镜全层和部分层切开术的对比研究。

A comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and partial-thickness myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) technique.

机构信息

Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1751-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2105-3. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) has been proposed as a new treatment of achalasia. In this technique, a partial-thickness myotomy (PTM) preserving the longitudinal outer esophageal muscular layer is advocated, which is different from the usual full-thickness myotomy (FTM) performed surgically. The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic FTM and PTM and analyze the outcomes of each method after a 4 week survival period.

METHODS

Twenty-four pigs were randomly assigned into group A (FTM, 12 animals) and group B (PTM) to undergo endoscopic myotomy. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was assessed using pull-through manometry. For statistical analysis we compared the average esophageal sphincter pressure values at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks between groups A and B. The P value was set as <0.05 for significance.

RESULTS

Eighteen animals were included for statistical analysis. Mean (SD) LES pressures were similar between groups A and B (nine animals each) at baseline [group A = 23 (10.4) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (8.7) mmHg; P = 0.79], after 2 weeks [group A = 19 (7.7) mmHg; group B = 21.8 (8.4) mmHg; P = 0.79], and after 4 weeks [group A = 22.6 (10.2) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (9) mmHg; P = 0.82]. LES pressures were significantly reduced in three animals after 4 weeks: one animal (1%) in group A and two animals (2.5%) in group B. An extended myotomy (3 cm below the cardia) was achieved in three animals and was responsible for the significant drop in LES pressure seen in the two animals from group B.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal myotomy using SEMF is a feasible yet challenging procedure in pigs. Full-thickness myotomy does not seem to be superior to partial-thickness myotomy as demonstrated by pull-through manometry. Endoscopic esophageal myotomy results are greatly influenced by obtaining adequate myotomy extension into the gastric cardia.

摘要

背景

黏膜下内镜下食管肌切开术(SEMF)联合黏膜安全瓣被提议作为贲门失弛缓症的一种新的治疗方法。在该技术中,提倡进行保留食管外纵行肌层的部分厚度肌切开术(PTM),这与手术中常用的全厚度肌切开术(FTM)不同。本研究的目的是比较内镜 FTM 和 PTM,并分析每种方法在 4 周的生存期间的结果。

方法

24 头猪被随机分为 A 组(FTM,12 头)和 B 组(PTM),进行内镜肌切开术。通过经食管测压法评估食管下括约肌(LES)压力。为了进行统计学分析,我们比较了 A 组和 B 组在基线、2 周后和 4 周后的平均食管括约肌压力值。显著性差异的 P 值设定为<0.05。

结果

18 头动物纳入统计学分析。A 组和 B 组(每组 9 头)的 LES 压力在基线时相似[A 组=23(10.4)mmHg;B 组=20.7(8.7)mmHg;P=0.79],2 周后[A 组=19(7.7)mmHg;B 组=21.8(8.4)mmHg;P=0.79],4 周后[A 组=22.6(10.2)mmHg;B 组=20.7(9)mmHg;P=0.82]。4 周后,3 头动物的 LES 压力显著下降:A 组 1 头(1%),B 组 2 头(2.5%)。3 头动物进行了扩展肌切开术(距离贲门 3 cm 以下),这导致了 B 组 2 头动物的 LES 压力显著下降。

结论

SEMF 内镜下食管肌切开术在猪中是一种可行但具有挑战性的方法。经食管测压法显示,全厚度肌切开术并不优于部分厚度肌切开术。内镜下食管肌切开术的结果受获得足够的胃贲门延伸肌切开术的影响很大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验