Suppr超能文献

肥胖症手术失败后转为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的适应证、安全性和可行性:与初次腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的回顾性对比研究。

Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2140-0. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the "gold standard" revision procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of primary laparoscopic RYGB (pLRYGB) to revisional open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (rRYGB).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent pLRYGB or rRYGB from January 2003 to December 2009 has been performed. Demographics, indications for revision, and complications have been reviewed. The rRYGB and pLRYGB patients have been compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent rRYGB, and 652 patients underwent pLRYGB. Mean follow-up was 35 and 45 months, respectively. Fifty-six rRYGB procedures were performed laparoscopically. The primary operations had consisted of laparoscopic gastric banding (n = 28), laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 19), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (n = 6), laparoscopic RYGB (n = 3), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (n = 16). Indications included weight regain (n = 29), malabsorption (n = 16), gastrogastric fistula (n = 5), band-associated problems (n = 3), and refractory stomal ulceration (n = 1). There was no significant difference in early or late postoperative complications when comparing rRYGB to pLRYGBP patients (11.1% vs. 5.52%, P = 0.069 and 19.4% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.465 respectively). Five rRYGB patients (7.04%) required reintervention (3 internal hernias, 1 ventral hernia, 1 laparoscopic exploration) compared with 101 pLRYGB patients (15.71%; P = 0.051). None of the patients died. Mean hospital stay was not significantly longer in the rRYGB group (5.38 vs. 4.95 days, P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality of rRYGB were not significantly higher compared with pLRYGB. Furthermore, we believe that this type of revisional bariatric surgery should be performed in high-volume bariatric centers.

摘要

背景

Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)被认为是“金标准”修正程序。本研究的目的是比较原发性腹腔镜 RYGB(pLRYGB)与再手术的开腹或腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(rRYGB)的手术结果。

方法

对 2003 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间行 pLRYGB 或 rRYGB 的所有患者进行回顾性分析。回顾了患者的人口统计学、修正适应证和并发症。比较了 rRYGB 和 pLRYGB 患者。

结果

72 例患者行 rRYGB,652 例患者行 pLRYGB。平均随访分别为 35 个月和 45 个月。56 例 rRYGB 手术为腹腔镜手术。初次手术包括腹腔镜胃束带术(n=28)、腹腔镜垂直带瓣胃成形术(n=19)、腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(n=6)、腹腔镜 RYGB(n=3)和胆胰分流加十二指肠转位术(n=16)。适应证包括体重反弹(n=29)、吸收不良(n=16)、胃-胃吻合口瘘(n=5)、束带相关问题(n=3)和难治性吻合口溃疡(n=1)。rRYGB 组与 pLRYGB 组在早期和晚期术后并发症方面无显著差异(11.1%比 5.52%,P=0.069 和 19.4%比 24.2%,P=0.465)。5 例 rRYGB 患者(7.04%)需要再次干预(3 例内疝,1 例腹疝,1 例腹腔镜探查),而 101 例 pLRYGB 患者(15.71%;P=0.051)。无患者死亡。rRYGB 组的平均住院时间无显著延长(5.38 天比 4.95 天,P=0.058)。

结论

在我们的系列中,rRYGB 的住院时间、发病率和死亡率与 pLRYGB 相比无显著增加。此外,我们认为这种类型的减重手术应在高容量减重中心进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验