Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
J Food Sci. 2012 Jan;77(1):S71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02510.x.
Consumption of soy protein has been associated with benefits related to numerous areas of health. Due to the widespread consumption of bread, one means of contributing to the health of individuals is through the incorporation of soy protein into bread. To this end, soy flour (SF) or soy protein isolates (SPIs) in 20% and 12% substitution levels, respectively, were added to flour during bread manufacture. The developed breads were tested using a consumer panel for acceptability, using a refined white bread as a control. These data were compared to attribute intensity data collected by the trained panel to identify specific flavor and texture characteristics affecting liking. The sensory profile of the 20% SF bread was acceptable and comparable to the control bread, despite a significantly stronger beany flavor. No significant differences in sensory properties of the SF and control breads were detected by the trained panel for many sensory attributes. The SPI bread, however, had a sensory profile that was significantly more firm, dense, sour, beany, bitter, and astringent with a strong aftertaste in comparison to the wheat control bread. Consumer liking scores for the SPI bread was significantly lower than the liking of the control and the SF added bread.
Many soy-enriched foods, while contributing positively to health, are considered unacceptable by consumers. This is due to negative sensory properties, such as beany, painty, and astringent notes, often perceived by consumers. This study provides information on the level of SF that can be included in bread in an amount that does not detract from consumer acceptability. This level also allows for a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) health claim to be made.
消费大豆蛋白与健康的诸多领域的益处相关。由于面包的广泛消费,为了促进个人健康的一种方法是通过将大豆蛋白加入面包。为此,分别以 20%和 12%替代水平的大豆粉(SF)或大豆蛋白分离物(SPI)添加到面粉中进行面包制作。利用消费者小组对可接受性对开发的面包进行测试,以精制白面包作为对照。将这些数据与经培训的小组收集的属性强度数据进行比较,以确定影响喜好的特定风味和质地特征。尽管豆腥味较强,但 20%SF 面包的感官特征是可接受的,并且与对照面包相当。对于许多感官属性,训练有素的小组未检测到 SF 和对照面包之间的感官特性有任何显著差异。然而,与小麦对照面包相比,SPI 面包的感官特征具有明显更硬、更密集、更酸、豆腥味、苦味和收敛性,并且余味强烈。与对照和添加 SF 的面包相比,消费者对 SPI 面包的喜爱评分明显较低。
许多富含大豆的食品虽然对健康有积极作用,但却被消费者认为不可接受。这是由于消费者经常感知到的负性感官特性,如豆腥味、颜料味和收敛性。本研究提供了有关可以在面包中添加 SF 的量的信息,该量不会降低消费者的可接受性。该水平还允许对食品和药物管理局(FDA)进行健康声明。