• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进日常使用楼梯:评估跨建筑的楼梯提示的影响。

Promoting routine stair use: evaluating the impact of a stair prompt across buildings.

机构信息

Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York 11101, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.005
PMID:22261209
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although studies have demonstrated that stair prompts are associated with increased physical activity, many were conducted in low-rise buildings over a period of weeks and did not differentiate between stair climbing and descent.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact of a prompt across different building types, and on stair climbing versus descent over several months.

METHODS

In 2008-2009, stair and elevator trips were observed and analyzed at three buildings in New York City before and after the posting of a prompt stating "Burn Calories, Not Electricity" (total observations=18,462). Sites included a three-story health clinic (observations=4987); an eight-story academic building (observations=5151); and a ten-story affordable housing site (observations=8324). Stair and elevator trips up and down were recorded separately at the health clinic to isolate the impact on climbing and descent. Follow-up was conducted at the health clinic and affordable housing site to assess long-term impact.

RESULTS

Increased stair use was seen at all sites immediately after posting of the prompt (range=9.2%-34.7% relative increase, p<0.001). Relative increases in stair climbing (20.2% increase, p<0.001) and descent (4.4% increase, p<0.05) were seen at the health clinic. At both sites with long-term follow-up, relative increases were maintained at 9 months after posting compared to baseline: 42.7% (p<0.001) increase in stair use at the affordable housing site and 20.3% (p<0.001) increase in stair climbing at the health clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that the prompt was effective in increasing physical activity in diverse settings, and increases were maintained at 9 months.

摘要

背景

尽管已有研究表明,楼梯提示可提高身体活动量,但这些研究大多在低层建筑中进行,且持续时间为数周,并未区分爬楼梯和下楼梯。

目的

本研究评估了提示在不同建筑类型中的影响,以及其在数月内对爬楼梯和下楼梯的影响。

方法

2008-2009 年,在纽约市的三栋建筑中,在张贴了一条提示信息“燃烧卡路里,而非电力”之后,观察并分析了楼梯和电梯的使用情况(总观察次数=18462)。这些地点包括一栋三层的健康诊所(观察次数=4987)、一栋八层的学术楼(观察次数=5151)和一栋十层的经济适用房(观察次数=8324)。在健康诊所中,单独记录了楼梯和电梯上下的使用情况,以隔离对爬楼梯和下楼梯的影响。在健康诊所和经济适用房进行了随访,以评估长期影响。

结果

提示发布后,所有地点的楼梯使用率均立即增加(相对增加范围为 9.2%-34.7%,p<0.001)。健康诊所中,爬楼梯(增加 20.2%,p<0.001)和下楼梯(增加 4.4%,p<0.05)的相对增加更为显著。在两个具有长期随访的地点中,与基线相比,发布后 9 个月的相对增加仍保持不变:经济适用房的楼梯使用率增加 42.7%(p<0.001),健康诊所的爬楼梯使用率增加 20.3%(p<0.001)。

结论

研究结果表明,提示在不同环境中有效提高了身体活动量,且 9 个月后仍保持增加。

相似文献

1
Promoting routine stair use: evaluating the impact of a stair prompt across buildings.促进日常使用楼梯:评估跨建筑的楼梯提示的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.005.
2
A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight.一项促进爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施:对超重者效果更佳。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Dec;14(12):2210-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259.
3
A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue- and white-collar worksites.一种基于海报的干预措施,用于促进蓝领和白领工作场所的楼梯使用。
Prev Med. 2007 Aug-Sep;45(2-3):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 May 21.
4
Promoting stair climbing in Barcelona: similarities and differences with interventions in English-speaking populations.促进巴塞罗那的楼梯攀爬:与英语国家干预措施的异同。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):100-2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp059. Epub 2009 May 12.
5
Promoting stair climbing: stair-riser banners are better than posters... sometimes.推广爬楼梯:楼梯竖板横幅有时比海报效果更好。
Prev Med. 2008 Apr;46(4):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.009. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
6
Review Article: Increasing physical activity with point-of-choice prompts--a systematic review.综述文章:利用选择点提示增加身体活动——系统综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Aug;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810375865. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
7
'Take the stairs instead of the escalator': effect of environmental prompts on community stair use and implications for a national 'Small Steps' campaign.“走楼梯而不是乘自动扶梯”:环境提示对社区楼梯使用的影响及对全国性“小步伐”运动的启示
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00219.x.
8
Six-month observational study of prompted stair climbing.对提示性爬楼梯的六个月观察性研究。
Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):422-7. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0908.
9
Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: what about escalator climbers?在楼梯和自动扶梯之间的选择点增加身体活动的提示:那自动扶梯攀爬者呢?
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):656-662. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby080.
10
Promoting physical activity in a low socioeconomic area: results from an intervention targeting stair climbing.促进低社会经济地区的身体活动:针对爬楼梯的干预措施的结果。
Prev Med. 2011 May;52(5):352-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learned from the development and implementation of a citywide stair prompt initiative.从全市楼梯提示倡议的制定和实施中吸取的经验教训。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:218-223. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.015. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Active design in affordable housing: A public health nudge.经济适用房的积极设计:一种公共卫生推动措施。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jan 31;10:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.015. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Is there sufficient evidence regarding signage-based stair use interventions? A sequential meta-analysis.
关于基于标识的楼梯使用干预措施,是否有足够的证据?一项序贯荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 28;7(11):e012459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012459.
4
And She's Buying a Stairway to Health: Signs and Participant Factors Influencing Stair Ascent at a Public Airport.她正在购买通往健康的阶梯:公共机场楼梯攀登的相关迹象及参与者因素
J Prim Prev. 2017 Dec;38(6):597-611. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0491-6.
5
Health goal priming as a situated intervention tool: how to benefit from nonconscious motivational routes to health behaviour.健康目标启动作为一种情境干预工具:如何利用非意识动机途径促进健康行为。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):408-424. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1183506. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
A multistage controlled intervention to increase stair climbing at work: effectiveness and process evaluation.一项旨在增加工作场所爬楼梯行为的多阶段对照干预措施:效果与过程评估
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 11;13:47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0371-0.
7
Obesity Prevention in a City State: Lessons from New York City during the Bloomberg Administration.城市国家的肥胖预防:布隆伯格政府时期纽约市的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2016 Mar 30;4:60. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00060. eCollection 2016.
8
Workplace building design and office-based workers' activity: a study of a natural experiment.工作场所建筑设计与办公室工作人员的活动:一项自然实验研究
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Feb;40(1):78-82. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12464. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
9
Physical Activity Design Guidelines for School Architecture.学校建筑的体育活动设计指南。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0132597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132597. eCollection 2015.
10
Self-reported sitting time in New York City adults, the Physical Activity and Transit Survey, 2010-2011.纽约市成年人自我报告的久坐时间,《2010 - 2011年身体活动与交通调查》
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 28;12:E85. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140488.