University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Prof Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.06.006.
Gains in knowledge and self-efficacy using human patient simulation (HPS) in the education of prelicensure nursing students have been reported. However, the predictors of improved learning outcomes using this teaching methodology are not known. Using a two-group (participated in HPS, did not participate in HPS), repeated-measures, experimental design, we examined the predictors of higher scores on a Knowledge Questionnaire in 162 students (age = 25.7 ± 6.6, gender = 85.5% female) from four prelicensure cohorts at three nursing schools. Statistical analysis consisted of t-tests, ANOVA and stepwise logistic regression. Covariates included age, gender, learning style, baseline critical thinking, baseline self-efficacy, group membership (control or experimental), and school. Membership in the experimental group was the only statistically significant independent predictor (P < .001) of knowledge gains among the covariates entered into the regression analysis. Members of the control group were two times less likely than those in the experimental group to be in the higher scored group (P < .001), yet this changed once the control group participated in HPS. Our findings show that HPS can independently improve test scores. This study provides evidence that HPS; is an effective teaching methodology for prelicensure nursing students regardless of age, learning style, or critical thinking ability.
已经有报道称,在护理专业学生的教育中,使用真人模拟(HPS)可以增加知识和自我效能感。然而,使用这种教学方法提高学习成果的预测因素尚不清楚。本研究采用了两组(参与 HPS 组和未参与 HPS 组)、重复测量、实验设计,我们在三所护理学校的四个护理预科班的 162 名学生(年龄=25.7±6.6,性别=85.5%女性)中,检查了在知识问卷上获得更高分数的预测因素。统计分析包括 t 检验、方差分析和逐步逻辑回归。协变量包括年龄、性别、学习风格、基础批判性思维、基础自我效能感、组别的(对照组或实验组)和学校。实验组的成员是回归分析中纳入的协变量中唯一具有统计学意义的独立预测因素(P<0.001)。与实验组相比,对照组的学生更不可能在更高得分组中(P<0.001),但这一情况在对照组参与 HPS 后发生了改变。我们的研究结果表明,HPS 可以独立提高考试成绩。本研究为 HPS 提供了证据,表明无论年龄、学习风格或批判性思维能力如何,它都是护理专业学生的一种有效的教学方法。