Suppr超能文献

溶栓治疗对曾接受抗凝治疗的脑卒中患者的安全性和结局。

Safety and outcomes following thrombolytic treatment in stroke patients who had received prior treatment with anticoagulants.

机构信息

Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(3):231-9. doi: 10.1159/000334662. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information is scare regarding the safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients under anticoagulant treatment, given that this is an exclusion criterion in clinical trials. We analyzed the risk of hemorrhagic complications following thrombolysis in patients under treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants (OA).

METHODS

In a multicentered prospective study of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous alteplase we recorded age, gender, baseline NIHSS score, treatment delay, risk factors, etiology and previous therapy. The neurological progress (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 7 days) and functional evolution at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score), mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) were compared between patients with LMWH or OA and those without prior anticoagulant therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 1,482 patients, 21 (1.4%) had received LMWH and 70 (4.7%) OA (international normalized ratio, INR, 0.9-2.0). Patients on OA were older, presented higher basal glucose levels, had been treated later and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior stroke, atrial fibrillation and cardioembolic pathologies. The severity of stroke on admission was similar in the different groups. The percentages of patients achieving independence (mRS 0-2) at 3 months were 33, 44 and 58 (LMWH, OA and no prior anticoagulant treatment, respectively; p = 0.02 for both comparisons of LMWH vs. no treatment and OA vs. no treatment); the mortality rates were 30, 25 and 12% (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, respectively) and the SICH were 14, 3 and 2% (p < 0.0001 for comparison of LMWH vs. no treatment). In the case of treatment with OA, the outcomes were independent of the INR value. Following adjustment for confounding variables, the prior use of OA was associated with higher mortality (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.1-4.2; p = 0.026) but not with SICH transformation or lower probability of independence. The use of LMWH was associated with higher mortality (OR: 5.3, 95% CI: 1.8-15.5; p = 0.002), risk of SICH (OR: 8.4, 95% CI: 2.2-32.2; p = 0.002) and lower probability of achieving independence (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.97; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intravenous thrombolysis appears to be safe in patients previously treated with OA with INR levels <2 since there is no increase in SICH. The prior use of LMWH appears to increase the risk of SICH, death and dependence and, as such, the decision for systemic treatment with thrombolytic agents needs to be taken with caution in these cases. Larger case series are necessary to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

鉴于静脉溶栓治疗是临床试验的排除标准,因此对于正在接受抗凝治疗的患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的安全性信息较为缺乏。我们分析了正在接受低分子肝素(LMWH)和口服抗凝剂(OA)治疗的患者接受溶栓治疗后出现出血性并发症的风险。

方法

在一项多中心前瞻性急性脑卒中患者的研究中,我们记录了年龄、性别、基线 NIHSS 评分、治疗延迟、危险因素、病因和既往治疗。比较 LMWH 或 OA 与无抗凝治疗患者的神经功能进展(7 天 NIHSS 评分)和 3 个月时的功能演变(改良 Rankin 量表评分)、死亡率和症状性颅内出血(SICH)。

结果

在 1482 例患者中,21 例(1.4%)接受了 LMWH 治疗,70 例(4.7%)接受了 OA 治疗(INR 0.9-2.0)。接受 OA 治疗的患者年龄更大,入院时血糖水平更高,治疗时间更晚,且高血压、血脂异常、既往卒中、心房颤动和心源性栓塞性病变的发生率更高。不同组间入院时的脑卒中严重程度相似。3 个月时达到独立(mRS 0-2)的患者比例分别为 33%、44%和 58%(LMWH、OA 和无抗凝治疗前,分别;LMWH 与无治疗相比和 OA 与无治疗相比,p = 0.02);死亡率分别为 30%、25%和 12%(p = 0.010,p = 0.001);SICH 发生率分别为 14%、3%和 2%(LMWH 与无治疗相比,p < 0.0001)。在接受 OA 治疗的情况下,结局与 INR 值无关。在调整混杂因素后,OA 的既往使用与更高的死亡率相关(OR:2.15,95%CI:1.1-4.2;p = 0.026),但与 SICH 转化或独立概率降低无关。LMWH 的使用与更高的死亡率相关(OR:5.3,95%CI:1.8-15.5;p = 0.002)、SICH 风险增加(OR:8.4,95%CI:2.2-32.2;p = 0.002)和达到独立的概率降低(OR:0.3,95%CI:0.1-0.97;p = 0.043)。

结论

对于 INR <2 的 OA 治疗患者,静脉溶栓治疗似乎是安全的,因为 SICH 无增加。LMWH 的既往使用似乎增加了 SICH、死亡和依赖的风险,因此,在这些情况下,需要谨慎决定是否对患者进行全身性溶栓治疗。需要更大的病例系列来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验