Suppr超能文献

阿根廷临床试验法规:监管框架概述与分析、现有工具的使用情况,以及研究人员对潜在障碍的看法。

Clinical trial regulation in Argentina: overview and analysis of regulatory framework, use of existing tools, and researchers' perspectives to identify potential barriers.

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 Nov;30(5):445-52. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892011001100007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze the regulatory framework of clinical trial registration, use of existing tools (publicly accessible national/international registration databases), and users' perspectives to identify possible barriers to registration compliance by sponsors and researchers in Argentina.

METHODS

Internationally registered trials recruiting patients in Argentina were found through clincialtrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (ICTRP) and compared with publically available clinical trials registered through the National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Devices (ANMAT). A questionnaire addressing hypothesized attitudinal, knowledge-related, idiomatic, technical, economic, and regulatory barriers that could discourage or impede registration of clinical trials was developed, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample of researchers (investigators, sponsors, and monitors) in Argentina.

RESULTS

A response rate of 74.3% (n = 29) was achieved, and 27 interviews were ultimately used for analysis. Results suggested that the high proportion of foreign-sponsored or multinational trials (64.8% of all protocols approved by ANMAT from 1994-2006) may contribute to a communication gap between locally based investigators and foreign-based administrative officials. A lack of knowledge about available international registration tools and limited awareness of the importance of registration were also identified as limiting factors for local investigators and sponsors.

CONCLUSIONS

To increase compliance and promote clinical trial registration in Argentina, national health authorities, sponsors, and local investigators could take the following steps: implement a grassroots educational campaign to improve clinical trial regulation, support local investigator-sponsor-initiated clinical trials, and/or encourage local and regional scientific journal compliance with standards from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and/or the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

摘要

目的

回顾和分析临床试验注册的监管框架,利用现有的工具(公开可获取的国家/国际注册数据库)以及用户的观点,确定阿根廷的申办者和研究者在注册合规方面可能存在的障碍。

方法

通过 clincialtrials.gov 和国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)查找在阿根廷招募患者的国际注册试验,并与通过国家药品、食品和医疗设备管理局(ANMAT)公开注册的可用临床试验进行比较。开发了一份调查问卷,内容涉及可能阻碍或妨碍临床试验注册的假设性态度、知识相关、惯用表达、技术、经济和监管障碍,并对阿根廷的研究人员(研究者、申办者和监查员)进行了有针对性的选择进行了半结构化深入访谈。

结果

达到了 74.3%(n=29)的回复率,最终对 27 次访谈进行了分析。结果表明,高比例的外国资助或跨国试验(1994-2006 年期间 ANMAT 批准的所有方案中有 64.8%)可能导致当地研究者和外国行政官员之间存在沟通障碍。缺乏对现有国际注册工具的了解以及对注册重要性的认识有限也被确定为当地研究者和申办者的限制因素。

结论

为了提高阿根廷的注册合规性并促进临床试验注册,国家卫生当局、申办者和当地研究者可以采取以下措施:实施基层教育运动以改善临床试验监管,支持当地研究者-申办者发起的临床试验,以及/或鼓励当地和地区性科学期刊遵守国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)和/或世界医学编辑协会(WAME)的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验