University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan;117(1):18-32. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.18.
Abstract The authors examined receptive and expressive language profiles for a group of verbal male children and adolescents who had fragile X syndrome along with varying degrees of autism symptoms. A categorical approach for assigning autism diagnostic classification, based on the combined use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), and a continuous approach for representing autism symptom severity, based on ADOS severity scores, were used in 2 separate sets of analyses. All analyses controlled for nonverbal IQ and chronological age. Nonverbal IQ accounted for significant variance in all language outcomes with large effect sizes. Results of the categorical analyses failed to reveal an effect of diagnostic group (fragile X syndrome-autism, fragile X syndrome-no autism) on standardized language test performance. Results of the continuous analyses revealed a negative relationship between autism symptom severity and all of the standardized language measures. Implications for representing autism symptoms in fragile X syndrome research are considered.
摘要 作者研究了一组患有脆性 X 综合征并伴有不同程度自闭症症状的男性言语儿童和青少年的接受性和表达性语言特征。在 2 组独立的分析中,使用了一种基于自闭症诊断访谈修订版和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)联合使用的分类方法来分配自闭症诊断分类,以及一种基于 ADOS 严重程度评分的表示自闭症症状严重程度的连续方法。所有分析均控制了非言语智商和年龄。非言语智商对所有语言结果的差异都有很大的影响。分类分析的结果未能显示诊断组(脆性 X 综合征-自闭症、脆性 X 综合征-无自闭症)对标准化语言测试表现的影响。连续分析的结果显示,自闭症症状严重程度与所有标准化语言测量指标呈负相关。考虑了在脆性 X 综合征研究中表示自闭症症状的意义。