Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 4, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):965-74. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00197. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
Consciousness can be manipulated in many ways. Here, we seek to understand whether two such ways, visual masking and pharmacological intervention, share a common pathway in manipulating visual consciousness. We recorded EEG from human participants who performed a backward-masking task in which they had to detect a masked figure form its background (masking strength was varied across trials). In a within-subject design, participants received dextromethorphan (a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist), lorazepam (LZP; a GABA(A) receptor agonist), scopolamine (a muscarine receptor antagonist), or placebo. The behavioral results show that detection rate decreased with increasing masking strength and that of all the drugs, only LZP induced a further decrease in detection rate. Figure-related ERP signals showed three neural events of interest: (1) an early posterior occipital and temporal generator (94-121 msec) that was not influenced by any pharmacological manipulation nor by masking, (2) a later bilateral perioccipital generator (156-211 msec) that was reduced by masking as well as LZP (but not by any other drugs), and (3) a late bilateral occipital temporal generator (293-387 msec) that was mainly affected by masking. Crucially, only the intermediate neural event correlated with detection performance. In combination with previous findings, these results suggest that LZP and masking both reduce visual awareness by means of modulating late activity in the visual cortex but leave early activation intact. These findings provide the first evidence for a common mechanism for these two distinct ways of manipulating consciousness.
意识可以通过多种方式进行操纵。在这里,我们试图了解两种这样的方式,视觉掩蔽和药物干预,是否在操纵视觉意识方面具有共同的途径。我们记录了人类参与者在进行后向掩蔽任务时的 EEG,在该任务中,他们必须从背景中检测出被掩蔽的图形(掩蔽强度在试验中变化)。在一项被试内设计中,参与者接受了右美沙芬(一种 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂)、劳拉西泮(LZP;一种 GABA(A)受体激动剂)、东莨菪碱(一种毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂)或安慰剂。行为结果表明,检测率随掩蔽强度的增加而降低,而在所有药物中,只有 LZP 进一步降低了检测率。与图形相关的 ERP 信号显示了三个感兴趣的神经事件:(1)一个早期的后顶叶和颞叶发生器(94-121 msec),不受任何药物干预或掩蔽的影响,(2)一个较晚的双侧顶叶发生器(156-211 msec),被掩蔽和 LZP (但不是任何其他药物)减少,以及(3)一个晚期的双侧枕颞叶发生器(293-387 msec),主要受掩蔽影响。至关重要的是,只有中间的神经事件与检测性能相关。结合以前的发现,这些结果表明,LZP 和掩蔽都是通过调节视觉皮层的后期活动来降低视觉意识,而保持早期激活不变。这些发现为这两种不同的操纵意识的方式具有共同的机制提供了第一个证据。