Suppr超能文献

在静息状态和运动应激状态下,卡维地洛和缬沙坦分别联合赖诺普利时的血流动力学及中心血压差异。

Hemodynamic and central blood pressure differences between carvedilol and valsartan added to lisinopril at rest and during exercise stress.

作者信息

Izzo Joseph L, Rajpal Minesh, Karan Shaila, Srikakarlapudi Sirisha, Osmond Peter J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012 Mar-Apr;6(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Abstract

There is little information about the hemodynamic and exercise-response implications of renin-angiotensin system blocker combinations. After a 3-week lisinopril (L; 40 mg/day) run-in, carvedilol (C; 20 then 40 mg/day) or valsartan (V; 160 then 320 mg/day) was added to L for 4 weeks each in a forced-titration, random order-entry crossover study in 30 subjects. Arterial tonometry (central pressures and time-tension index, TTI); impedance cardiography (steady-state hemodynamics), and ultrasound (carotid flow) were performed at rest and during supine bicycle exercise at 30 and 60 watts. At rest, both V and C lowered TTI similarly (7% to 9%, P = .05 compared with L, in part because they lowered blood pressure (3 to 7/3 to 4 mm Hg). V lowered central systolic pressure, augmentation pressure (AP), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, all P < .02); C lowered heart rate but not central systolic pressure or SVR. During exercise, V persistently lowered central systolic pressure, AP, and SVR, whereas C did not. Neither drug affected exercise responses or carotid blood flow. Adding V or C to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor reduced cardiac workload by different mechanisms: vasodilation and reduced central blood pressure with V and lower heart rate with C.

摘要

关于肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂联合使用对血流动力学和运动反应的影响,相关信息较少。在一项针对30名受试者的强制滴定、随机顺序进入交叉研究中,经过3周赖诺普利(L;40毫克/天)导入期后,卡维地洛(C;先20毫克/天,后40毫克/天)或缬沙坦(V;先160毫克/天,后320毫克/天)分别添加到L中,各持续4周。在静息状态以及仰卧位骑功率自行车运动30瓦和60瓦时,进行动脉张力测量(中心压力和时间-张力指数,TTI)、阻抗心动图(稳态血流动力学)和超声检查(颈动脉血流)。静息时,V和C降低TTI的程度相似(7%至9%,与L相比P = 0.05),部分原因是它们降低了血压(3至7/3至4毫米汞柱)。V降低了中心收缩压、增强压(AP)和全身血管阻力(SVR,均P < 0.02);C降低了心率,但未降低中心收缩压或SVR。运动期间,V持续降低中心收缩压、AP和SVR,而C则没有。两种药物均未影响运动反应或颈动脉血流。在血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂基础上加用V或C,通过不同机制降低心脏负荷:V通过血管舒张和降低中心血压,C通过降低心率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验