Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Mar;22(3):391-406. doi: 10.1111/jch.13758. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.
由于无创中心血压(BP)测量设备易于获得,中心 BP 在高血压管理中的临床应用越来越受到关注。中心 BP 和外周 BP 之间的差异早已得到认可。一些先前的研究表明,与靶器官损伤和长期心血管结局相关,无创中心 BP 可能优于传统的肱动脉 BP。最近的研究进一步表明,用中心 BP 来确诊高血压的策略可能比传统策略更具成本效益,用中心 BP 来指导高血压管理可能会减少药物的使用以达到 BP 控制。尽管使用中心 BP 很有前景,但需要更多的比较中心 BP 指导的治疗策略与传统护理对心血管事件减少的随机对照研究,因为无创中心和肱动脉 BP 测量都很方便。在这篇简要的综述中,总结了支持中心 BP 在临床实践中的效用的基本原理和相关挑战。