Inadvertent surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND

The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) published Improving Outcome Guidance in 2006 defining urgent referral criteria for soft tissue sarcoma (STSs) with the twin aims of improving diagnostic accuracy and overall outcome. Despite these guidelines inadvertent excisions of soft tissue sarcomas continue to occur with alarming frequency, potentially compromising patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the East Midlands Sarcoma Service experience of treating inadvertent excision of STSs and highlight the patient profile, referral pattern, subsequent management and oncological outcome associated with inadvertent resection.

METHODS

Patients were identified from our sarcoma database and a retrospective case note review performed.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, 42 patients presented to our specialist centre after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas. There were 29 men and 13 women, with a mean age at presentation of 59 years (19-90). 50% of the tumours were located in lower extremity, 33% around the trunk and 17% in the upper extremity. The unplanned surgery was most commonly from general surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners followed by vascular surgeons. Re-resection was undertaken in 40 cases to achieve clear margins with residual tumour present in 74% of cases. Limb salvage surgery was not possible in 5 cases.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned excision of sarcoma by non-oncologic surgeons remains a problem. It appears that it is equally prevalent in varied surgical community and general practitioners. Excision of large or deep solid soft tissue masses without tissue diagnosis is unacceptable.