Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):294-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01814.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
The outcome of analyses that prioritize locations for conservation on the basis of distributions of species, land cover, or other elements is influenced by the spatial resolution of data used in the analyses. We explored the influence of data resolution on prioritization of Finnish forests with Zonation, a software program that ranks the priority of cells in a landscape for conservation. We used data on the distribution of different forest types that were aggregated to nine different resolutions ranging from 0.1 × 0.1 km to 25.6 × 25.6 km. We analyzed data at each resolution with two variants of Zonation that had different criteria for prioritization, with and without accounting for connectivity and with and without adjustment for the effect on the analysis of edges between areas at the project boundary and adjacent areas for which data do not exist. Spatial overlap of the 10% of cells ranked most highly when data were analyzed at different resolutions varied approximately from 15% to 60% and was greatest among analyses with similar resolutions. Inclusion of connectivity or edge adjustment changed the location of areas that were prioritized for conservation. Even though different locations received high priority for conservation in analyses with and without accounting for connectivity, accounting for connectivity did not reduce the representation of different forest types. Inclusion of connectivity influenced most the outcome of fine-resolution analyses because the connectivity extents that we based on dispersal distances of typical forest species were small. When we kept the area set aside for conservation constant, representation of the forest types increased as resolution increased. We do not think it is necessary to avoid use of high-resolution data in spatial conservation prioritization. Our results show that large extent, fine-resolution analyses are computationally feasible, and we suggest they can give more flexibility to implementation of well-connected reserve networks.
分析结果优先考虑基于物种分布、土地覆盖或其他要素的保护地点,这受到分析中使用的数据空间分辨率的影响。我们使用了一种名为 Zonation 的软件程序,该程序对景观中的单元格进行保护优先级排序,以此来探索数据分辨率对芬兰森林优先排序的影响。我们使用了不同森林类型分布的数据,这些数据被聚合到九个不同的分辨率中,范围从 0.1×0.1km 到 25.6×25.6km。我们在两种不同的优先级标准下,使用两种不同的 Zonation 变体分析了每个分辨率的数据,一种标准考虑了连通性,另一种标准不考虑,并且还调整了项目边界处的边缘区域和相邻区域对分析的影响,因为这些区域没有数据。当在不同分辨率下分析数据时,排名前 10%的单元格的空间重叠大约在 15%到 60%之间,并且在分辨率相似的分析中重叠最大。连通性的包含或边缘调整改变了被优先考虑保护的区域的位置。即使在考虑和不考虑连通性的分析中,不同的位置都被赋予了很高的保护优先级,但考虑连通性并没有减少不同森林类型的代表性。连通性的包含对精细分辨率分析的结果影响最大,因为我们基于典型森林物种扩散距离的连通性范围很小。当我们保持保护区的面积不变时,分辨率的提高会增加森林类型的代表性。我们认为在空间保护优先级排序中没有必要避免使用高分辨率数据。我们的结果表明,大尺度、精细分辨率的分析在计算上是可行的,我们建议它们可以为实现连通良好的保护区网络提供更大的灵活性。