Suppr超能文献

富钙混合水泥和三氧化矿物凝聚体与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较。

Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.

作者信息

Oskoee Siavash Savadi, Kimyai Soodabeh, Bahari Mahmoud, Motahari Paria, Eghbal Mohammad Jafar, Asgary Saeed

机构信息

Dental and Periodontal Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):457-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076.

Abstract

AIM

Adhesion of composite resin and pulp capping biomaterials remarkably influences treatment outcomes. This in vitro study aimed to compare the shear bond strength of composite resin to calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) with or without acid etching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 cylindrical acrylic blocks containing a central hole, measuring 4 mm diameter and 2 mm height were prepared. The blocks were randomly divided into three experimental groups based on being filled with CEM, MTA or RMGI. Samples in each group were then randomly divided into two subgroups, i.e. with or without phosphoric acid etching. Placing composite resin cylinders on the samples, shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine. Failure modes of the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests.

RESULTS

Shear bond strengths in the etched and nonetched samples were not significantly different (p = 0.60). There was a significant difference in shear bond strength values of the three experimental materials (p < 0.001) and RMGI showed the highest strength values (p < 0.001); no significant difference was observed between MTA and CEM (p = 0.51). The interaction of the type of material and surface etching was statistically significant (p < 0.001). All of the samples showed cohesive failure mode.

CONCLUSION

Acid etching of MTA, CEM and RMGI do not improve the shear bond strength of these materials to composite resin. Besides, shear bond strength values of MTA and CEM to composite resin, are favorable due to their cohesive mode of failure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

When MTA and CEM biomaterials are used in vital pulp therapy, it is advisable to cover these materials with RMGI. In addition, if it is not possible to use RMGI, the surface etching of MTA and CEM biomaterials is not necessary prior to composite restoration using total-etch adhesive resin.

摘要

目的

复合树脂与牙髓盖髓生物材料的粘结显著影响治疗效果。本体外研究旨在比较复合树脂与富钙混合物(CEM)水门汀、三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI)在有无酸蚀情况下的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

制备90个含中心孔的圆柱形丙烯酸树脂块,直径4mm,高2mm。根据填充材料的不同,将这些块随机分为三个实验组,分别填充CEM、MTA或RMGI。然后,每组样本再随机分为两个亚组,即有或无磷酸酸蚀。在样本上放置复合树脂圆柱体,使用万能试验机测量剪切粘结强度。在体视显微镜下评估样本的失效模式。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析。

结果

酸蚀和未酸蚀样本的剪切粘结强度无显著差异(p = 0.60)。三种实验材料的剪切粘结强度值存在显著差异(p < 0.001),RMGI的强度值最高(p < 0.001);MTA和CEM之间未观察到显著差异(p = 0.51)。材料类型与表面酸蚀的相互作用具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。所有样本均呈现内聚破坏模式。

结论

对MTA、CEM和RMGI进行酸蚀并不能提高这些材料与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度。此外,MTA和CEM与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度值因其内聚破坏模式而较为理想。

临床意义

当在活髓治疗中使用MTA和CEM生物材料时,建议用RMGI覆盖这些材料。此外,如果无法使用RMGI,在使用全酸蚀粘结树脂进行复合修复之前,对MTA和CEM生物材料进行表面酸蚀没有必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验