• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粘结材料对三氧化矿物凝聚体剪切粘结强度的影响。

Effect of adhesive materials on shear bond strength of a mineral trioxide aggregate.

作者信息

Ali Ahmed, Banerjee Avijit, Mannocci Francesco

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):46-50.

PMID:27093776
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and fractography between mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and glass-ionomer cement (GIC) or resin composite (RC) after varying MTA setting time intervals.

METHODS

MTA was mixed and packed into standardized cavities (4 mm diameter x 3 mm depth) in acrylic blocks. RC with 37% H₃PO₄ and type 2 (etch and rinse) adhesive, or conventional GIC was bonded to the exposed MTA sample surfaces after 10-minute, 24-hour, 72-hour and 30-day MTA setting intervals (n = 10/group, eight groups). Samples were stored (37°C, 24 hours, 100% humidity) before SBS testing and statistical analysis (ANOVA, Tukey LSD, P < 0.05). Fractography was undertaken using stereomicroscopy for all samples and three random samples/group by using SEM.

RESULTS

Significant differences between all groups were found (P= 0.002). SBS of RC:MTA (Max 5.09 ± 1.79 MPa) was higher than the SBS of GIC:MTA (Max 3.74 ± 0.70 MPa) in 24-hour, 72-hour and 30-day groups except in the 10-minute MTA setting time groups, where SBS of GIC:MTA was higher. There was a significant effect of time on SBS of RC: MTA (P = 0.008) and no effect on SBS of GIC:MTA (P = 3.00). Fractography revealed mixed (adhesive/cohesive) failures in all groups; in RC:MTA groups there was a decrease in adhesive failure with time in contrast to the GIC:MTA groups.

摘要

目的

比较不同三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)凝固时间间隔后,MTA与玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)或树脂复合体(RC)之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)及断口形貌。

方法

将MTA混合并填充到丙烯酸树脂块体中的标准化窝洞(直径4mm×深度3mm)内。在MTA凝固10分钟、24小时、72小时及30天后,将含37%磷酸和2型(酸蚀冲洗型)粘结剂的RC或传统GIC粘结到暴露的MTA样本表面(每组n = 10,共八组)。在进行SBS测试和统计分析(方差分析、Tukey最小显著差异法,P < 0.05)之前,样本先储存(37°C,24小时,100%湿度)。对所有样本使用体视显微镜进行断口形貌分析,每组随机选取三个样本使用扫描电子显微镜进行断口形貌分析。

结果

发现所有组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.002)。在24小时、72小时和30天组中,RC:MTA的SBS(最大值5.09±1.79MPa)高于GIC:MTA的SBS(最大值3.74±0.70MPa),但在MTA凝固10分钟组中,GIC:MTA的SBS更高。时间对RC:MTA的SBS有显著影响(P = 0.008),对GIC:MTA 的SBS无影响(P = 3.00)。断口形貌分析显示所有组均为混合(粘结/内聚)破坏;与GIC:MTA组相比,RC:MTA组中粘结破坏随时间减少。

相似文献

1
Effect of adhesive materials on shear bond strength of a mineral trioxide aggregate.粘结材料对三氧化矿物凝聚体剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):46-50.
2
Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin.三氧化矿物凝聚体表面处理对其形态及与复合树脂粘结强度的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.富钙混合水泥和三氧化矿物凝聚体与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):457-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076.
4
Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cement to Different Root Perforation Materials.自粘树脂水门汀与不同根管穿孔材料的粘结强度
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1819-1821. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.不同修复材料与光固化三氧化矿物凝聚体的粘结强度
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Winter;39(2):143-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.84x57tp110k46183.
6
Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals.不同时间间隔下黏结剂系统对矿物三氧化物聚合体的粘结强度。
J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®).两种树脂基复合材料和玻璃离子水门汀与纯硅酸三钙基水门汀(BioDentine®)的剪切粘结强度评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):302-6. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130660.
8
Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate.传统玻璃离子水门汀与三氧化矿物凝聚体的剪切粘结强度。
J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1381-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
9
Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.三种不同纳米修复材料与牙本质的抗剪粘接强度。
Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):50-7. doi: 10.2341/09-051-L.
10
Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to composite resin using a universal adhesive in different application modes: an in vitro study.不同应用模式下通用黏合剂对钙硅基水泥与复合树脂间粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Aust Dent J. 2024 Jun;69(2):102-111. doi: 10.1111/adj.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.黏附系统与硅酸钙基材料的黏结强度:体外研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Gels. 2022 May 18;8(5):311. doi: 10.3390/gels8050311.
2
Self-Limiting versus Rotary Subjective Carious Tissue Removal: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-2-Year Results.自限性与旋转式主观龋损组织去除术:一项随机对照临床试验——2年结果
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 25;9(9):2738. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092738.