• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠外营养输注系统对危重症患者血流感染发展的影响:一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、对照研究——EPICOS 研究。

Influence of parenteral nutrition delivery system on the development of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, controlled study--EPICOS study.

机构信息

Intensive Care and Nutrition Department, Fernandes Távora Hospital, Fortaleza, Brazil.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Sep;36(5):574-86. doi: 10.1177/0148607111427040. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1177/0148607111427040
PMID:22269899
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is associated with an increased risk of developing bloodstream infections (BSIs) but the impact of the PN delivery system upon BSI rates remains unclear. This was an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial that investigated the differences of BSIs associated with 2 different PN systems.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated in a 2:1:1 ratio to receive either PN delivered by a multichamber bag (MCB group), or by compounded PN made with olive oil (COM1 group) or with MCT/LCT (COM2 group). Blood cultures were performed to evaluate the incidence of BSIs, and catheter use data was collected to calculate CLAB and central venous catheter device use ratio (CVC-DUR). Secondary outcomes included the development of severe sepsis/septic shock, number of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital days, and all-cause mortality at Day 28.

RESULTS

406 patients were included: 202 in the MCB group, 103 in the COM1 group, and 101 in the COM2 group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 3 groups, BSIs were significantly higher in patients receiving compounded PN (46 BSIs for COM1+COM2 vs 34 BSIs for MCB; p = 0.03).CLAB was higher in patients receiving compounded PN (13.2 for COM1+COM2 vs 10.3 for MCB; p < 0.0001). No differences were observed for the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Compounded PN was associated with a higher incidence of BSIs and CLABs, suggesting that the use of MCB PN may play a role in reducing the incidence of BSIs in patients who receive PN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00798681.

摘要

背景

肠外营养(PN)与发生血流感染(BSI)的风险增加相关,但 PN 输送系统对 BSI 发生率的影响尚不清楚。这是一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、对照试验,旨在研究 2 种不同 PN 系统与 BSI 相关的差异。

方法

患者以 2:1:1 的比例随机分配接受多腔袋(MCB 组)、橄榄油配制的 PN(COM1 组)或 MCT/LCT 配制的 PN(COM2 组)。进行血培养以评估 BSI 的发生率,并收集导管使用数据以计算 CLAB 和中心静脉导管装置使用比(CVC-DUR)。次要结局包括严重脓毒症/感染性休克的发生、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院天数以及第 28 天的全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入 406 例患者:MCB 组 202 例,COM1 组 103 例,COM2 组 101 例。3 组间基线特征均衡,接受复合 PN 的患者 BSI 发生率明显更高(COM1+COM2 组 46 例,MCB 组 34 例;p=0.03)。接受复合 PN 的患者 CLAB 更高(COM1+COM2 组 13.2,MCB 组 10.3;p<0.0001)。次要结局无差异。

结论

复合 PN 与 BSI 和 CLAB 的发生率较高相关,提示 MCB PN 的使用可能在降低接受 PN 的患者 BSI 发生率方面发挥作用。

试验注册号

NCT00798681。

相似文献

1
Influence of parenteral nutrition delivery system on the development of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, controlled study--EPICOS study.肠外营养输注系统对危重症患者血流感染发展的影响:一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、对照研究——EPICOS 研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Sep;36(5):574-86. doi: 10.1177/0148607111427040. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
2
Bloodstream infections associated with parenteral nutrition preparation methods in the United States: a retrospective, large database analysis.美国静脉营养制剂制备方法相关血流感染:回顾性大型数据库分析。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Mar;36(2):169-76. doi: 10.1177/0148607111414714. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
3
Peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in hospitalized adult patients.住院成年患者外周置入中心静脉导管相关血流感染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):125-30. doi: 10.1086/657942.
4
Route of nutrition and risk of blood stream infections in critically ill patients; a comparative study.危重症患者的营养途径与血流感染风险;一项对比研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016 Apr;12:e14-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
Epidemiology of bloodstream infection associated with parenteral nutrition.肠外营养相关血流感染的流行病学
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):S173.e5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.007.
6
Central venous catheter related bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients in a tertiary referral centre.三级转诊中心内科重症监护病房患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2014 Apr-Jun;56(2):85-91.
7
A retrospective, observational study of patient outcomes for critically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition.一项回顾性、观察性研究,评估接受肠外营养的危重症患者的患者结局。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
Comparing the risk of bloodstream infections by type of parenteral nutrition preparation method: A large retrospective, observational study.比较不同肠外营养制剂配制方法导致血流感染的风险:一项大型回顾性观察研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Apr;30:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Parenteral nutrition-associated bloodstream infection in an Australian teaching hospital--an 8-year retrospective study of over 11,000 PN-days.澳大利亚一家教学医院的肠外营养相关血流感染——对超过11000个肠外营养日的8年回顾性研究
Scand J Infect Dis. 2014 May;46(5):361-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.880185. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
Catheter-associated bloodstream infections: looking outside of the ICU.导管相关血流感染:重症监护室外的情况
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):S172.e5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes for Patients Receiving Multi-Chamber Bags for the Delivery of Parenteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review.接受多腔袋进行肠外营养输注的患者的结局:一项系统评价
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 20;16(22):3964. doi: 10.3390/nu16223964.
2
Parenteral nutrition in clinical practice: International challenges and strategies.临床实践中的肠外营养:国际挑战与策略
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Jun 13;81(Supplement_3):S89-S101. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae079.
3
Association between parenteral nutrition-containing intravenous lipid emulsion and bloodstream infections in patients with single-lumen central venous access: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.
单腔中心静脉通路患者中含静脉用脂肪乳剂的肠外营养与血流感染的关系:一项随机试验的二次分析。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2023 Aug;47(6):783-795. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2530. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
The Rate of Discontinuing Ready-to-Use Multi-Chamber Bag Parenteral Nutrition Secondary to High Serum Electrolyte Levels.因血清电解质水平高而停用即用型多腔袋肠外营养的发生率。
Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jun;58(3):263-271. doi: 10.1177/00185787221133711. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
5
Lipid-Enriched Parenteral Nutrition and Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Patients: Is It a Real Concern?富含脂肪的肠外营养与住院患者血流感染:这真的值得关注吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 1;58(7):885. doi: 10.3390/medicina58070885.
6
Omega-6 sparing effects of parenteral lipid emulsions-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.肠外营养脂质乳剂的ω-6节约效应——关于危重症患者临床结局的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 19;26(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03896-3.
7
Guidelines for parenteral and enteral nutrition in geriatric patients in China.中国老年患者肠外与肠内营养指南。
Aging Med (Milton). 2020 May 31;3(2):110-124. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12110. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Premixed vs Compounded Parenteral Nutrition: Effects of Total Parenteral Nutrition Shortage on Clinical Practice.预混与复合肠外营养:全肠外营养短缺对临床实践的影响。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00291-3.
9
Safety of a Triple-chamber Bag Parenteral Nutrition in Children Ages up to 24 Months: An Observational Study.24 月龄以下儿童使用三腔袋肠外营养液的安全性:一项观察性研究。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Dec;69(6):e151-e157. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002512.
10
Quality improvement initiative to reduce adverse effects associated with parenteral nutrition overfeeding.旨在减少与肠外营养过度喂养相关不良影响的质量改进举措。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;10(1):67-71. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100995. Epub 2018 Jun 8.