Keio Advanced Research Centers, Keio University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychooncology. 2012 Feb;21(2):144-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.1877. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
OBJECTIVE: Although social support has been recognized as an important factor in the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients, there has been little investigation of the buffering effect of social support on these patients' social distress or of the coping skill of self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine how social support and self-efficacy mediate the relationship between social distress and emotional distress in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-five head and neck cancer patients completed our questionnaire (effective response rate, 92.2%). Of these, 129 (57.3%) had facial disfigurement. These participants responded to questions about perception of social distress, social support, self-efficacy, and emotional distress (depression and anxiety). We used structural equation modeling for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The fit indices of this model were excellent (χ2 (7) = 9.147, p = 0.242, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.981, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.922, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.993, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.049). Self-efficacy strongly buffered the negative influence of social distress on emotional distress. Social support from family members did not have a direct or indirect influence on emotional distress. Social support from friends was related to lower social distress and higher emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that self-efficacy might confound the relationship between social support and emotional distress, and that different sources of social support might play different roles in the mediation of social distress on emotional distress.
目的:尽管社会支持已被确认为头颈部癌症患者生活质量的重要因素,但很少有研究调查社会支持对这些患者社会困扰的缓冲作用,也很少有研究调查自我效能的应对技能。本研究旨在检验社会支持和自我效能如何在头颈部癌症患者的社会困扰与情绪困扰之间起中介作用。
方法:225 名头颈部癌症患者完成了我们的问卷(有效应答率为 92.2%)。其中 129 名(57.3%)有面部毁容。这些参与者回答了关于感知社会困扰、社会支持、自我效能和情绪困扰(抑郁和焦虑)的问题。我们使用结构方程模型进行统计分析。
结果:该模型的拟合指数非常好(χ2(7)=9.147,p=0.242,拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.981,调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)=0.922,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.993,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.049)。自我效能强烈缓冲了社会困扰对情绪困扰的负面影响。来自家庭成员的社会支持没有直接或间接影响情绪困扰。来自朋友的社会支持与较低的社会困扰和较高的情绪困扰有关。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,自我效能可能会混淆社会支持与情绪困扰之间的关系,不同来源的社会支持可能在社会困扰对情绪困扰的中介作用中发挥不同的作用。
Palliat Support Care. 2011-6
Head Neck. 2011-3-11
Psychooncology. 2007-6
Support Care Cancer. 2022-7
Biopsychosoc Med. 2016-4-12
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014-3-24
Psychooncology. 2014-3