Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, FL 33620, USA.
Psychooncology. 2012 Feb;21(2):203-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.1883. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
Prior research suggests that fear of cancer recurrence (FOR) is very common among cancer survivors. This study examined the extent to which the interaction of threat appraisal and coping appraisal accounted for differences in FOR in cancer patients who recently completed treatment. It was hypothesized that greater FOR would be related to a combination of high threat appraisal and low coping appraisal.
A sample of 155 early stage breast cancer patients (mean age = 59 years) who completed surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy between 6 and 24 months previously (mean = 12 months) completed measures of FOR, threat appraisal (perceived risk and severity of a potential cancer recurrence), and coping appraisal (perceived response efficacy and self-efficacy to perform diet and exercise recommendations to reduce recurrence risk). Basic demographic and clinical information were also collected.
Threat appraisal accounted for 30% of the variance in FOR (p<0.001) while coping appraisal accounted for 0% (p = 0.64). After accounting for these variables and relevant covariates, the interaction of threat appraisal and coping appraisal explained 2% of the remaining variance in FOR (p = 0.04). As hypothesized, survivors who reported high threat appraisal and low coping appraisal had the highest FOR.
Future research should focus on examining these relationships longitudinally and further assess coping appraisal and how it impacts cancer recurrence fears.
先前的研究表明,癌症幸存者中非常普遍存在对癌症复发的恐惧(FOR)。本研究考察了威胁评估和应对评估的相互作用在最近完成治疗的癌症患者中对 FOR 差异的解释程度。研究假设,较高的 FOR 将与高威胁评估和低应对评估的组合相关。
本研究选取了 155 名早期乳腺癌患者(平均年龄= 59 岁)作为样本,他们在 6 至 24 个月前(平均= 12 个月)完成了手术、化疗和/或放疗,完成了对 FOR、威胁评估(对潜在癌症复发的风险和严重程度的感知)和应对评估(对执行饮食和运动建议以降低复发风险的感知反应效能和自我效能)的测量。还收集了基本的人口统计学和临床信息。
威胁评估解释了 FOR 变异的 30%(p<0.001),而应对评估解释了 0%(p = 0.64)。在考虑这些变量和相关协变量后,威胁评估和应对评估的相互作用解释了 FOR 剩余变异的 2%(p = 0.04)。正如假设的那样,报告高威胁评估和低应对评估的幸存者具有最高的 FOR。
未来的研究应该重点关注纵向检查这些关系,并进一步评估应对评估及其如何影响癌症复发恐惧。