• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.

作者信息

Abbott Anne L, Adelman Mark A, Alexandrov Andrei V, Barnett Henry Jm, Beard Jonathan, Bell Peter, Björck Martin, Blacker David, Buckley Clifford J, Cambria Richard P, Comerota Anthony J, Sander Connolly E, Davies Alun H, Eckstein Hans-Henning, Faruqi Rishad, Fraedrich Gustav, Gloviczki Peter, Hankey Graeme J, Harbaugh Robert E, Heldenberg Eitan, Kittner Steven J, Kleinig Timothy J, Mikhailidis Dimitri P, Moore Wesley S, Naylor Ross, Nicolaides Andrew, Paraskevas Kosmas I, Pelz David M, Prichard James W, Purdie Grant, Ricco Jean-Baptiste, Riles Thomas, Rothwell Peter, Sandercock Peter, Sillesen Henrik, David Spence J, Spinelli Francesco, Tan Aaron, Thapar Ankur, Veith Frank J, Zhou Wei

出版信息

Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):1-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201102. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1258/vasc.2011.201102
PMID:22271806
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.为何美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心不应扩大颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术的报销适应症。
Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):1-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201102. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
2
CMS considers expanding reimbursement for carotid stenting.美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心考虑扩大对颈动脉支架置入术的报销范围。
Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):1. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201104. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
3
Should Medicare reimbursement for carotid artery stenting be extended to standard and low risk symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis?医疗保险对颈动脉支架置入术的报销范围应扩大到患有颈动脉狭窄的标准风险和低风险有症状及无症状患者吗？
Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201103. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
4
Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.为何美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心（CMS）不应扩大颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术的报销指征。
Int Angiol. 2012 Feb;31(1):85-9.
5
Let my people (Medicare patients) go: a plea to the centers of Medicare and Medicaid services.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):656-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22521.
6
Catch-22: Carotid stenting is safe and effective (Food and Drug Administration) but is it reasonable and necessary (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)?第二十二条军规：颈动脉支架置入术是安全有效的（美国食品药品监督管理局），但它合理且必要吗？（美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心）
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):694-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.001.
7
Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at increased surgical risk: results from the SAPPHIRE trial.增加手术风险患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的成本和成本效益：来自 SAPPHIRE 试验的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar 1;77(4):463-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22869.
8
Economics of carotid revascularization.颈动脉血运重建的经济学
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar 1;77(4):473-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23001.
9
Cost implications of more widespread carotid artery stenting consistent with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline.更广泛地采用符合美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的颈动脉支架置入术的成本影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):585-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.034. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Carotid endarterectomy: still the standard of care for carotid bifurcation disease.颈动脉内膜切除术：仍是颈动脉分叉病变的标准治疗方法。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):10-20. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.03.005.