第二十二条军规：颈动脉支架置入术是安全有效的（美国食品药品监督管理局），但它合理且必要吗？（美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心） - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Catch-22: Carotid stenting is safe and effective (Food and Drug Administration) but is it reasonable and necessary (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)?

作者信息

White Christopher J, Jaff Michael R

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):694-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.001

PMID:22721670

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Catch-22: Carotid stenting is safe and effective (Food and Drug Administration) but is it reasonable and necessary (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)?第二十二条军规：颈动脉支架置入术是安全有效的（美国食品药品监督管理局），但它合理且必要吗？（美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心）

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):694-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.001.

Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.为何美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心（CMS）不应扩大颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术的报销指征。

Int Angiol. 2012 Feb;31(1):85-9.

Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.为何美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心不应扩大颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术的报销适应症。

Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):1-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201102. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

CMS considers expanding reimbursement for carotid stenting.美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心考虑扩大对颈动脉支架置入术的报销范围。

Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):1. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201104. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Should Medicare reimbursement for carotid artery stenting be extended to standard and low risk symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis?医疗保险对颈动脉支架置入术的报销范围应扩大到患有颈动脉狭窄的标准风险和低风险有症状及无症状患者吗？

Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201103. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Let my people (Medicare patients) go: a plea to the centers of Medicare and Medicaid services.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):656-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22521.

Hospital reimbursement for carotid stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术的医院报销

J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Apr;21(2):296-302. doi: 10.1583/13-4549.1.

Commentary: carotid artery stenting: still not as cost-effective as carotid endarterectomy, but the contest continues.评论：颈动脉支架置入术：仍不如颈动脉内膜切除术具有成本效益，但竞争仍在继续。

J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Apr;21(2):303-5. doi: 10.1583/13-4549C.1.

Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty cui bono.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉血管成形术：谁受益。

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39 Suppl 1:S44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

Carotid artery stenting in the nation: the influence of hospital and physician volume on outcomes.国内的颈动脉支架置入术：医院及医生手术量对治疗结果的影响。

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Feb;44(2):89-94. doi: 10.1177/1538574409354653. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

Unplanned readmission after carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: analysis of the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗后非计划性再入院的比较：美国全国再入院数据库分析。

J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):242-247. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018523. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术试验（CREST）前后颈动脉血运重建的国家模式。

JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):51-57. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3496.

Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.医师专业与为医疗保险患者选择的颈动脉血运重建技术的差异。

J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.颈动脉支架置入术的最新进展：试验数据、技术要点及局限性

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Jun;7(4):446-57. doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9567-3. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Recent publications by ochsner authors.奥克斯纳作者近期发表的作品。

Ochsner J. 2012 Winter;12(4):396-401.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验