Department of Health Policy and Administration, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Jan 1;90(1):30-9, 39A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.090399. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
To identify factors driving the rapid increase in caesarean section in China between 1988 and 2008.
Data from four national cross-sectional surveys (1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008) and modified Poisson regression were used to determine whether changes in household income, access to health insurance or women's education accounted for the rise in caesarean sections in urban and rural areas.
In 2008, 64.1% of urban women and 11.3% of women in the poorest rural region reported giving birth by caesarean section. A fast rise was occurring in all socioeconomic groups. Between 1993 and 2008, the risk of caesarean section had increased more than threefold in urban areas (relative risk, RR: 3.63; 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.61-5.04) and more than 15-fold in rural areas (RR: 15.46; 95% CI: 10.46-22.86). After adjustment for improvements in income, education and access to health insurance over the study period, the RR dropped minimally in urban areas (RR: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.32-4.07), which suggests that these factors do not explain the rise; in rural areas, the adjusted RR dropped to 7.18 (95% CI: 4.82-10.69), which shows that socioeconomic change is only partly responsible for the rise. Socioeconomic region of residence was a more important driver of the caesarean section rate than individual socioeconomic status.
The large variation in caesarean section rate by socioeconomic region--independent of individual income, health insurance or education--suggests that structural factors related to service supply have influenced the increasing rate more than a woman's ability to pay.
探讨 1988 年至 2008 年期间中国剖宫产率快速上升的驱动因素。
本研究使用来自四项全国性横断面调查(1993 年、1998 年、2003 年和 2008 年)的数据和修正泊松回归,以确定家庭收入、医疗保险可及性或妇女教育水平的变化是否导致城乡剖宫产率的上升。
2008 年,64.1%的城市妇女和最贫困农村地区 11.3%的妇女报告采用剖宫产分娩。所有社会经济群体的剖宫产率都在快速上升。1993 年至 2008 年期间,城市地区剖宫产率增加了三倍以上(相对风险,RR:3.63;95%置信区间,CI:2.61-5.04),农村地区增加了 15 倍以上(RR:15.46;95%CI:10.46-22.86)。调整研究期间收入、教育和医疗保险可及性的改善后,城市地区的 RR 略有下降(RR:3.07;95%CI:2.32-4.07),表明这些因素并不能解释剖宫产率的上升;农村地区调整后的 RR 下降至 7.18(95%CI:4.82-10.69),表明社会经济变化只是导致剖宫产率上升的部分原因。居住地的社会经济区域是剖宫产率的一个更重要驱动因素,而不是个体的社会经济地位。
社会经济区域的剖宫产率差异很大,独立于个体收入、医疗保险或教育水平,这表明与服务供应相关的结构性因素对不断上升的剖宫产率的影响大于妇女的支付能力。