Taye Birhan Ambachew, Weldearegay Belyu Yehualashet, Yirsaw Bantie Getnet, Demsie Melese Enyew, Asfaw Fasiledes Fetene, Teka Abebe Birhanu, Belete Aychew Kassa
Department of Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Department of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8.
Preference of mode of delivery refers to the expectant mother's personal choice or preference for the method by which she would like to have her baby delivered. Although there are many fragmented primary studies on the preference of mode of delivery among women in East Africa, the pooled preference rate is unknown. In addition, those studies disagreed on reporting the associated factors. Therefore, this study was intended to determine the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors among women in East Africa.
We searched studies using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Google Scholar that were published between March 01/2014 and March 31/2024. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted by two authors independently using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 17. A random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors. The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42024541921.
A total of 14 studies comprising 47,561 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The pooled preference of vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery were 75% ((95% C.I = 67 - 83%) and 25% (95% C.I = 17 - 34%), [Formula: see text]respectively. This study showed that ANC-follow (OR= 1.11; 95% CI=0.67-1.82), previous intrapartum satisfaction (OR= 2.69; 95% CI = 0.53-13.64), place of residence (OR= 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.42), occupation (P=0.000; OR= 0.97; 95% CI=0.67-1.42), planned pregnancy (OR= 1.89; 95% CI=1.26-2.82), previous history of spontaneous abortion (OR= 2.30; 95% CI=0.71-7.44), current pregnancy related problem (OR= 3.86; 95% CI=1.37-10.84), discussion with a partner (OR= 0.67; 95% CI=0.35-1.27), types of the hospital (OR= 1.13; 95% CI = 0.65-1.94) were significant factors associated with preference of mode of delivery.
The preference for vaginal delivery was higher than for cesarean delivery. Factors such as antenatal care follow-up, previous intrapartum satisfaction, place of residence, occupation, planned pregnancy, prior history of spontaneous abortion, maternal education, current pregnancy-related problems, discussion with partner, and types of hospital were significantly associated. The findings of this study imply a multifaceted approach is required.
分娩方式偏好是指准妈妈对其希望分娩方式的个人选择或偏好。尽管有许多关于东非女性分娩方式偏好的零散的初步研究,但汇总的偏好率尚不清楚。此外,这些研究在报告相关因素方面存在分歧。因此,本研究旨在确定东非女性分娩方式的汇总偏好及其相关因素。
我们检索了2014年3月1日至2024年3月31日期间发表在PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Science Direct和谷歌学术上的研究。本研究采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南。使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估工具评估研究质量。由两位作者独立使用Microsoft Excel提取数据,并使用Stata 17版进行分析。应用随机效应模型计算分娩方式及其相关因素的汇总偏好。该综述的PROSPERO注册号为CRD42024541921。
本Meta分析共纳入14项研究,涉及47561名参与者。阴道分娩和剖宫产的汇总偏好分别为75%(95%置信区间=67%-83%)和25%(95%置信区间=17%-34%),[公式:见正文]。本研究表明,产前检查随访(OR=1.11;95%置信区间=0.67-1.82)、既往产时满意度(OR=2.69;95%置信区间=0.53-13.64)、居住地点(OR=1.10;95%置信区间=0.86-1.42)、职业(P=0.000;OR=0.97;95%置信区间=0.67-1.42)、计划妊娠(OR=1.89;95%置信区间=1.26-2.82)、既往自然流产史(OR=2.30;95%置信区间=0.71-7.44)、当前妊娠相关问题(OR=3.86;95%置信区间=1.37-10.84)、与伴侣讨论(OR=0.67;95%置信区间=0.35-1.27)、医院类型(OR=1.13;95%置信区间=0.65-1.94)是与分娩方式偏好相关的显著因素。
阴道分娩的偏好高于剖宫产。产前检查随访、既往产时满意度、居住地点、职业、计划妊娠、既往自然流产史、母亲教育程度、当前妊娠相关问题、与伴侣讨论以及医院类型等因素存在显著关联。本研究结果表明需要采取多方面的方法。