Bezreh Tanya, Laws M Barton, Taubin Tatiana, Rifkin Dena E, Wilson Ira B
Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:11-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S25971. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
Patients frequently do not take medicines as prescribed and often do not communicate with their physicians about their medication-taking behavior. The movement for "patient-centered" care has led to relabeling of this problem from "noncompliance" to "nonadherence" and later to a rhetoric of "concordance" and "shared decision making" in which physicians and patients are viewed as partners who ideally come to agreement about appropriate treatment. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of online comments to a New York Times article on low rates of medication adherence. The online discussion provides data about how a highly selected, educated sample of patients thinks about medication use and the doctor-patient relationship. Our analysis revealed patient empowerment and self-reliance, considerable mistrust of medications and medical practice, and frequent noncommunication about medication adherence issues. We discuss how these observations can potentially be understood with reference to Habermas's theory of communicative action, and conclude that physicians can benefit from better understanding the negative ways in which some patients perceive physicians' prescribing practices.
患者常常不按医嘱服药,而且往往不就其服药行为与医生沟通。“以患者为中心”的医疗运动导致了对这一问题的重新定义,从“不依从”改为“不坚持”,后来又演变成“一致性”和“共同决策”的说法,在这种理念中,医生和患者被视为合作伙伴,理想情况下会就适当的治疗达成一致。我们对《纽约时报》一篇关于药物依从率低的文章的在线评论进行了定性内容分析。在线讨论提供了有关经过高度筛选、受过教育的患者样本如何看待药物使用和医患关系的数据。我们的分析揭示了患者的赋权和自力更生、对药物和医疗实践的极大不信任,以及在药物依从性问题上频繁的不沟通。我们讨论了如何参照哈贝马斯的交往行为理论来理解这些观察结果,并得出结论,医生可以从更好地理解一些患者对医生开药做法的负面看法中受益。