Suppr超能文献

接受推注-持续释放氢吗啡酮与缓释羟考酮治疗慢性髋或膝关节骨关节炎疼痛患者的健康相关生活质量结局:一项随机、开放标签、平行组、多中心研究。

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients Treated with Push-Pull OROS Hydromorphone versus Extended-Release Oxycodone for Chronic Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study.

机构信息

1 Abt Bio-Pharma Solutions, Incorporated, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA 2 QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, Rhode Island, USA 3 Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey, USA 4 Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium 5 Patient Value Solutions, Huldenberg, Belgium.

出版信息

Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):223-38. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain impacts health-related quality of life (HR-QOL).

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare HR-QOL outcomes following treatment with once-daily push-pull Osmotic controlled-Release Oral delivery System (OROS) hydromorphone versus twice-daily extended-release (ER) oxycodone for moderate to severe chronic knee or hip OA pain.

METHODS

This was a 6-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study of 124 patients with OA whose pre-trial treatment included NSAIDs or other non-steroidal, non-opioid analgesics. The HR-QOL of patients was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC™). Within- and between-group changes from baseline to 6 weeks were evaluated using ANOVA.

RESULTS

At baseline, trial patients had significantly worse MOS Sleep Scale (multivariate ANOVA [MANOVA] F = 11.0, p < 0.001) and WOMAC™ scores (MANOVA F = 55.7, p < 0.001) than chronic disease benchmarks. Both treatment groups showed significant improvements on the sleep disturbance scale (p < 0.01), with additional improvements observed with OROS hydromorphone on the sleep quantity (p = 0.046), sleep snoring (p = 0.044), awaken short of breath or with a headache (p = 0.024), 6-item sleep problems index I (p < 0.001), and 9-item sleep problems index II (p < 0.001) scales. Significant treatment differences in favor of OROS hydromorphone over ER oxycodone were also observed on the awaken short of breath or with a headache (p = 0.014) scale and sleep problems index I (p = 0.045). Both treatment groups showed comparable large effect size (>0.8 SD unit) improvements on the WOMAC™ scale (measuring functionality outcomes such as pain, stiffness, physical function etc).

CONCLUSION

Both OROS hydromorphone and ER oxycodone improved sleep and function, with greater sleep benefits being observed in patients treated with OROS hydromorphone.

摘要

背景

慢性骨关节炎(OA)疼痛会影响健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)。

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估和比较每日一次推注-拉动渗透控释口服给药系统(OROS)氢吗啡酮与每日两次延长释放(ER)羟考酮治疗中重度慢性膝或髋 OA 疼痛的 HR-QOL 结果。

方法

这是一项为期 6 周、随机、开放标签、平行组、多中心研究,共纳入 124 例 OA 患者,这些患者在试验前的治疗中包括 NSAIDs 或其他非甾体、非阿片类镇痛药。采用医疗结局研究(MOS)睡眠量表和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC™)评估患者的 HR-QOL。采用方差分析(ANOVA)评估从基线到 6 周的组内和组间变化。

结果

在基线时,试验患者的 MOS 睡眠量表(多变量方差分析[MANOVA] F=11.0,p<0.001)和 WOMAC™评分(MANOVA F=55.7,p<0.001)均显著差于慢性病基准。两组治疗均显著改善睡眠障碍量表(p<0.01),并且 OROS 氢吗啡酮还显著改善睡眠量(p=0.046)、睡眠打鼾(p=0.044)、呼吸急促或头痛醒来(p=0.024)、6 项睡眠问题指数 I(p<0.001)和 9 项睡眠问题指数 II(p<0.001)量表。与 ER 羟考酮相比,OROS 氢吗啡酮在呼吸急促或头痛醒来(p=0.014)量表和睡眠问题指数 I(p=0.045)上也有显著的治疗优势。两组治疗均对 WOMAC™量表(测量疼痛、僵硬、身体功能等功能结果)有类似的较大效应量(>0.8 SD 单位)改善。

结论

OROS 氢吗啡酮和 ER 羟考酮均可改善睡眠和功能,而 OROS 氢吗啡酮治疗的患者睡眠获益更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验