• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚重度沙眼患儿使用阿奇霉素的两日给药方案与一日给药方案对比

Two-day dosing versus one-day dosing of azithromycin in children with severe trachoma in Tanzania.

作者信息

Campbell J Peter, Mkocha Harran, Munoz Beatriz, West Sheila K

机构信息

Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland , USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;19(1):38-42. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2011.627490.

DOI:10.3109/09286586.2011.627490
PMID:22273357
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether 2-day dosing of azithromycin may improve the efficacy of azithromycin dosing in children with severe trachoma.

METHODS

Fifty children with severe trachoma (defined as either trachoma intense or follicular trachoma with ten or more follicles) were enrolled from five villages in Kongwa, Tanzania. Enrollment occurred within 1 month and within the same district as the historical control population of 99 children with severe trachoma, all of whom received 1-day dosing. Baseline data on age, sex, and trachoma status were obtained, and swabs for determination of Chlamydia trachomatis were taken. All 50 children received 20 mg/kg azithromycin daily for 2 days, which was directly observed. Children were followed up at 6 weeks for trachoma and infection. The laboratory was masked to treatment assignment.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment group and the control group. A total of 1/46 (2.2%) of children in the treatment group were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive at 6 weeks, a 96.3% reduction from baseline, compared to 13/96 (13.5%) in the historical control group, an 89.4% reduction. This difference was statistically significant. However when modeled using logistic regression and accounting for age, gender, weight, and baseline percent PCR positivity, the difference was not significant. Prevalence of clinical trachoma did not differ between the groups at 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

For children with severe trachoma, a randomized controlled trial of 2-day versus 1-day treatment may be warranted.

摘要

目的

确定阿奇霉素两日给药方案是否可提高重度沙眼患儿阿奇霉素给药的疗效。

方法

从坦桑尼亚孔瓜的五个村庄招募了50名重度沙眼患儿(定义为严重沙眼或有十个及以上滤泡的滤泡性沙眼)。招募在1个月内进行,且与99名重度沙眼历史对照人群在同一地区,所有历史对照人群均接受一日给药。获取了年龄、性别和沙眼状况的基线数据,并采集了用于检测沙眼衣原体的拭子。所有50名儿童均接受每日20mg/kg阿奇霉素,共2天,给药过程直接观察。在6周时对儿童进行沙眼和感染情况的随访。实验室人员对治疗分配情况不知情。

结果

治疗组和对照组的基线特征相似。治疗组中共有1/46(2.2%)的儿童在6周时聚合酶链反应(PCR)呈阳性,较基线时降低了96.3%,而历史对照组中为13/96(13.5%),降低了89.4%。这一差异具有统计学意义。然而,在使用逻辑回归模型并考虑年龄、性别、体重和基线PCR阳性百分比后,差异不显著。6周时两组间临床沙眼患病率无差异。

结论

对于重度沙眼患儿,可能有必要进行2日与1日治疗的随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Two-day dosing versus one-day dosing of azithromycin in children with severe trachoma in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚重度沙眼患儿使用阿奇霉素的两日给药方案与一日给药方案对比
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;19(1):38-42. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2011.627490.
2
Randomized trial of high dose azithromycin compared to standard dosing for children with severe trachoma in Tanzania.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):175-80. doi: 10.1080/09286580902863015.
3
Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma.采用单剂量阿奇霉素进行沙眼群体治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1962-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040979.
4
Evaluation of a Single Dose of Azithromycin for Trachoma in Low-Prevalence Communities.低流行社区单剂量阿奇霉素治疗沙眼的评估
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2017.1293693. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Risk factors for ocular infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in children 6 months following mass treatment in Tanzania.沙眼衣原体感染儿童在坦桑尼亚大规模治疗后 6 个月的眼部感染风险因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Mar 15;5(3):e978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000978.
6
Ocular immune responses, Chlamydia trachomatis infection and clinical signs of trachoma before and after azithromycin mass drug administration in a treatment naïve trachoma-endemic Tanzanian community.阿奇霉素群体药物治疗前后未经治疗的沙眼流行的坦桑尼亚社区的眼部免疫反应、沙眼衣原体感染和沙眼临床体征。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jul 15;13(7):e0007559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007559. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Serology for trachoma surveillance after cessation of mass drug administration.大规模药物给药停止后用于沙眼监测的血清学检测
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Feb 25;9(2):e0003555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003555. eCollection 2015 Feb.
8
Surveillance and Azithromycin Treatment for Newcomers and Travelers Evaluation (ASANTE) Trial: Design and Baseline Characteristics.新移民和旅行者评估的监测与阿奇霉素治疗(ASANTE)试验:设计与基线特征
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;23(6):347-353. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1238947. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
Trachoma and ocular Chlamydia trachomatis were not eliminated three years after two rounds of mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic village.在一个沙眼高度流行村庄进行两轮大规模治疗三年后,沙眼和沙眼衣原体眼部感染并未消除。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;48(4):1492-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0625.
10
Is there evidence for resistance of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis to azithromycin after mass treatment for trachoma control?大规模沙眼控制治疗后,眼衣原体对阿奇霉素的耐药性是否有证据?
J Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 1;210(1):65-71. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu046. Epub 2014 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Models of Trachoma Transmission and Their Policy Implications: From Control to Elimination.沙眼传播模型及其政策意义:从控制到消除。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 1;66(suppl_4):S275-S280. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy004.
2
Enhanced antibiotic distribution strategies and the potential impact of facial cleanliness and environmental improvements for the sustained control of trachoma: a modelling study.强化抗生素分配策略以及面部清洁和环境改善对沙眼持续控制的潜在影响:一项建模研究
BMC Med. 2016 May 19;14(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0614-6.
3
Application of DNA chip scanning technology for automatic detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae inclusions.
DNA 芯片扫描技术在沙眼衣原体和肺炎衣原体包涵体自动检测中的应用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):405-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01400-13. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
Will the SAFE strategy be sufficient to eliminate trachoma by 2020? Puzzlements and possible solutions.到2020年,“SAFE”策略足以消除沙眼吗?困惑与可能的解决办法。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 May 19;2013:648106. doi: 10.1155/2013/648106. Print 2013.