Suppr超能文献

一项针对美国内科重症监护专科住院医师培训计划中气道管理培训的全国性调查。

A national survey of airway management training in United States internal medicine-based critical care fellowship programs.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle WA 98195-9724, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2012 Jul;57(7):1084-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01540.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensivists may be primarily responsible for airway management in non-operating room locations. Little is known of airway management training provided during fellowship.Our primary aim was to describe the current state of airway education in internal medicine-based critical care fellowship programs.

METHODS

Between February 1 and April 30, 2011, program directors of all 3-year combined pulmonary/critical care and 2-year multidisciplinary critical care medicine programs in the United States were invited to complete an online survey. Contact information was obtained via FRIEDA Online (https://freida.ama-assn.org). Non-responders were sent automated reminders, were contacted by e-mail, or by telephone.

RESULTS

The overall response proportion was 66% (111/168 programs). Sixty-four (58%) programs reported a designated airway rotation, chiefly occurring for 1 month during the first year of training. Thirty-five programs (32%)reported having a director of airway education and 78 (70%) reported incorporating simulation based airway education. Nearly all programs (95%) reported provision of supervised airway experience during fellowship. Commonly used airway management devices, including video laryngoscopes,intubating stylets, supraglottic airway devices, and fiberoptic bronchoscopes, were reportedly available to trainees. However, 73% reported < 10 uses of a supraglottic airway device, 60% < 25 uses of intubating stylets, 73% < 30 uses of a video laryngoscope, and 65% reported < 10 flexible fiberoptic intubations. Estimates of the required number of procedures to ensure competence varied widely.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of programs have a formal airway management program incorporating a variety of intubation techniques. Overall experience varies widely, however.

摘要

背景

在非手术室环境中,重症医师可能主要负责气道管理。关于 fellowship 期间提供的气道管理培训,我们知之甚少。我们的主要目的是描述内科重症监护 fellowship项目中气道教育的现状。

方法

2011 年 2 月 1 日至 4 月 30 日,邀请美国所有 3 年联合肺/重症监护和 2 年多学科重症监护医学项目的项目主任完成在线调查。通过 FRIEDA Online(https://freida.ama-assn.org)获得联系信息。对未回复者发送自动提醒,通过电子邮件或电话联系。

结果

总体回复率为 66%(111/168 个项目)。64 个(58%)项目报告了指定的气道轮转,主要在培训的第一年进行 1 个月。35 个项目(32%)报告有气道教育主任,78 个(70%)报告采用模拟气道教育。几乎所有项目(95%)报告在 fellowship期间提供有监督的气道经验。受训者可获得常用的气道管理设备,包括视频喉镜、插管导丝、声门上气道装置和纤维支气管镜。然而,73%的项目报告使用声门上气道装置的次数<10 次,60%的项目报告使用插管导丝的次数<25 次,73%的项目报告使用视频喉镜的次数<30 次,65%的项目报告使用纤维支气管镜的次数<10 次。估计确保熟练掌握所需的程序数量差异很大。

结论

大多数项目都有一个正式的气道管理计划,其中包括各种插管技术。然而,总体经验差异很大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验