Medina-Walpole Annette, Barker William H, Katz Paul R
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14620, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):607-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52170.x.
Geriatric fellowship training has significantly advanced in the past 2 decades in number, organization, and accreditation of formal fellowship programs. A recent survey examined career decision-making, fellowship training, and current professional activities of fellowship trained geriatricians. This paper focuses upon further desired fellowship training identified by these individuals. The responses reflect skills relevant to four aspects of professional performance: administration, management, clinical geriatrics, research, and education. More than half of the respondents documented the need for increased training in administration, including long-term care medical directorship and Medicare/managed care. Regarding clinical training, 66% recommended additional subspecialty training, particularly in psychiatry, neurology, rehabilitation, and hospice/palliative care. Seventeen percent identified a need for training in research methodology, grant writing, and mentorship. Some 6% indicated a need for further training in education, citing teaching skills and program/faculty development. This article provides examples of opportunities to strengthen each of the four defined areas, including formal training in medical administration by the American Medical Director's Association, model strategies for incorporating subspecialties, hospice/palliative care, programs to pursue graduate level training in research at many universities, and faculty development programs such as those offered by Harvard and Stanford. Accredited geriatric fellowship programs as well as fellows should recognize potential gaps in training, and make available opportunities to strengthen these areas critical to preparing for future careers in geriatric medicine.
在过去20年中,老年医学专科培训在正式专科培训项目的数量、组织和认证方面取得了显著进展。最近的一项调查研究了接受专科培训的老年医学专家的职业决策、专科培训及当前的专业活动。本文重点关注这些人所确定的进一步的专科培训需求。这些反馈反映了与专业表现的四个方面相关的技能:管理、行政、临床老年医学、研究和教育。超过一半的受访者记录了增加管理培训的需求,包括长期护理医疗主任和医疗保险/管理式医疗方面的培训。关于临床培训,66%的人建议增加亚专科培训,特别是在精神病学、神经病学、康复和临终关怀/姑息治疗方面。17%的人认为需要研究方法、资助申请撰写和指导方面的培训。约6%的人表示需要在教育方面进一步培训,理由是教学技能和项目/教师发展。本文提供了加强四个既定领域中每个领域的机会示例,包括美国医学主任协会提供的医学管理方面的正式培训、纳入亚专科和临终关怀/姑息治疗的示范策略、许多大学提供的研究生阶段研究培训项目,以及哈佛和斯坦福等机构提供的教师发展项目。经认可的老年医学专科培训项目以及专科培训学员应认识到培训中的潜在差距,并提供机会加强这些对老年医学未来职业准备至关重要的领域。