Suppr超能文献

精神障碍患者神经心理测验表现的荟萃分析。

A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Effort Test Performance in Psychotic Disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Sep;30(3):407-424. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09448-2. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

Abstract

Psychotic disorders are characterized by a generalized neurocognitive deficit (i.e., performance 1.5 SD below controls across neuropsychological domains with no specific profile of differential deficits). A motivational account of the generalized neurocognitive deficit has been proposed, which attributes poor neuropsychological testing performance to low effort. However, findings are inconsistent regarding effort test failure rate in individuals with psychotic disorders across studies (0-72%), and moderators are unclear, making it difficult to know whether the motivational explanation is viable. To address these issues, a meta-analysis was performed on data from 2205 individuals with psychotic disorders across 19 studies with 24 independent effects. Effort failure rate was examined along with moderators of effort test type, forensic status, IQ, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, diagnosis, age, gender, education, and antipsychotic use. The pooled weighted effort test failure rate was 18% across studies and there was a moderate pooled association between effort failure rate and global neurocognitive performance (r = .57). IQ and education significantly moderated failure rate. Collectively, these findings suggest that a nontrivial proportion of individuals with a psychotic disorder fail effort testing, and failure rate is associated with global neuropsychological impairment. However, given that effort tests are not immune to the effects of IQ in psychotic disorders, these results cannot attest to the viability of the motivational account of the generalized neurocognitive deficit. Furthermore, the significant moderating effect of IQ and education on effort test performance suggests that effort tests have questionable validity in this population and should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

精神病性障碍的特征是普遍存在的神经认知缺陷(即,神经心理学领域的表现比对照组低 1.5 个标准差,没有特定的差异缺陷模式)。已经提出了一种神经认知缺陷的动机解释,认为神经心理学测试表现不佳归因于低努力。然而,在不同的研究中,精神病性障碍个体的努力测试失败率不一致(0-72%),而且调节因素也不清楚,这使得很难知道动机解释是否可行。为了解决这些问题,对来自 19 项研究的 2205 名精神病性障碍个体的数据进行了荟萃分析,这些研究共有 24 个独立效应。检查了努力测试失败率以及努力测试类型、法医状况、智商、阳性症状、阴性症状、诊断、年龄、性别、教育和抗精神病药物使用的调节因素。研究之间的努力测试失败率的合并加权率为 18%,努力失败率与整体神经认知表现之间存在中度合并相关性(r = .57)。智商和教育显著调节失败率。总的来说,这些发现表明,相当一部分精神病性障碍个体未能通过努力测试,失败率与整体神经心理损伤有关。然而,鉴于努力测试在精神病性障碍中不能免受智商的影响,这些结果不能证明普遍存在的神经认知缺陷的动机解释是可行的。此外,智商和教育对努力测试表现的显著调节作用表明,努力测试在该人群中的有效性值得怀疑,应该谨慎解释。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Assessing harmonized intelligence measures in a multinational study.在一项跨国研究中评估统一的智力测量方法。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Feb 23;11:e22. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.22. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
The Latent Structure of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症阴性症状的潜在结构。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1271-1279. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2475.
5
Effort Testing in Dementia Assessment: A Systematic Review.痴呆评估中的努力测试:一项系统综述。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):114-131. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy012.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验