Suppr超能文献

在声称患有轻度创伤性脑损伤相关脑震荡后症状的个体中,一项或多项效标效度测试未通过的风险。

The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.

作者信息

Proto Daniel A, Pastorek Nicholas J, Miller Brian I, Romesser Jennifer M, Sim Anita H, Linck John F

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mental Health Care Line, Houston, TX, USA Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation and Extended Care Line, Houston, TX, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Nov;29(7):614-24. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu044. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Abstract

Evaluating performance validity is important in any neuropsychological assessment, and prior research recommends a threshold for invalid performance of two or more performance validity test (PVT) failures. However, extant findings also indicate that failing a single PVT is associated with significant changes in neuropsychological performance. The current study sought to determine if there is an appreciable difference in neuropsychological testing results between individuals failing different numbers of PVTs. In a sample of veterans with reported histories of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; N =178), analyses revealed that individuals failing only one PVT performed significantly worse than individuals failing no PVTs on measures of verbal learning and memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Additionally, individuals failing one versus two PVTs significantly differed only on delayed free recall scores. The current findings suggest that failure of even one PVT should elicit consideration of performance invalidity, particularly in individuals with histories of mTBI.

摘要

在任何神经心理学评估中,评估表现效度都很重要,先前的研究建议将两项或更多项表现效度测试(PVT)未通过作为无效表现的阈值。然而,现有研究结果也表明,单项PVT未通过与神经心理学表现的显著变化有关。本研究旨在确定在不同数量PVT未通过的个体之间,神经心理学测试结果是否存在明显差异。在一个有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)报告病史的退伍军人样本(N = 178)中,分析显示,仅一项PVT未通过的个体在言语学习和记忆、处理速度及认知灵活性测量方面的表现显著差于未出现PVT未通过的个体。此外,一项PVT未通过与两项PVT未通过的个体仅在延迟自由回忆分数上存在显著差异。当前研究结果表明,即使一项PVT未通过也应引发对表现无效性的考虑,尤其是在有mTBI病史的个体中。

相似文献

9
Ecological validity of performance validity testing.效标效度测试的生态效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 May;29(3):236-44. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu002. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
10
When Failing One Performance Validity Test Matters.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Sep-Oct;32(5):1418-1429. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2285503. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

2
Racial differences in positive findings on embedded performance validity tests.嵌入式表现效度测试阳性结果中的种族差异。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Jan-Feb;32(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2146504. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

4
Assessing effort: differentiating performance and symptom validity.评估努力程度:区分表现和症状真实性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(8):1234-46. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.835447. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Effort test failure: toward a predictive model.运动试验失败:建立预测模型。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(8):1377-96. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.728248. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验