Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, and The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1144-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2237-8.
Early diagnosis and successful treatment of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) is essential in preventing articular degeneration at a young age. Surgical treatment of stable JOCD lesions failing nonoperative treatment involves retroarticular or transarticular drilling to induce revascularization and healing. Multiple case series report high healing rates and infrequent complications for both retroarticular and transarticular drilling modalities; however, it is unclear from these individual reports whether one mode of drilling provides higher healing rates.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether transarticular or retroarticular drilling of stable JOCD lesions results in differing patient-oriented outcomes, rates of radiographic healing, time to radiographic healing, and complication rates.
We systematically reviewed the short-term clinical outcomes of retroarticular and transarticular drilling of stable OCD lesions. PubMed and additional sources identified 65 studies; 12 studies met inclusion criteria.
Heterogeneity and quality of studies limited review to qualitative analysis. No clear differences were seen in patient-oriented outcomes after treatment with either drilling modality. Radiographic healing for JOCD lesions drilled retroarticularly occurred in 96 of 111 (86%) lesions in an average of 5.6 months. Transarticular drilling of JOCD lesions resulted in 86 of 94 (91%) lesions healing by radiography in an average of 4.5 months. No complications were reported for either drilling modality.
Retroarticular and transarticular drilling of stable lesions results in comparable short-term patient-oriented outcomes and radiographic healing. Further high-quality comparative studies are required to adequately compare drilling modalities, clearly define radiographic healing, and patient-oriented outcomes after nonoperative treatment.
青少年剥脱性骨软骨炎(JOCD)的早期诊断和成功治疗对于防止幼年关节退变至关重要。对于非手术治疗失败的稳定 JOCD 病变,手术治疗包括关节后或关节内钻孔以诱导血管再生和愈合。多项病例系列报告显示,关节后和关节内钻孔两种方法均具有较高的愈合率和较少的并发症;然而,从这些单独的报告中尚不清楚哪种钻孔方式提供更高的愈合率。
问题/目的:我们想知道关节后或关节内钻孔治疗稳定 JOCD 病变是否会导致不同的以患者为中心的结果、放射学愈合率、放射学愈合时间和并发症发生率。
我们系统地回顾了关节后和关节内钻孔治疗稳定 OCD 病变的短期临床结果。PubMed 和其他来源确定了 65 项研究;12 项研究符合纳入标准。
研究的异质性和质量限制了对定性分析的综述。两种钻孔方式治疗后,患者的结果没有明显差异。关节后钻孔治疗 JOCD 病变的平均 5.6 个月时,111 个病变中有 96 个(86%)出现放射学愈合。关节内钻孔治疗 JOCD 病变的 94 个病变中有 86 个(91%)在平均 4.5 个月时通过 X 线片愈合。两种钻孔方式均未报告并发症。
关节后和关节内钻孔治疗稳定病变可获得相似的短期以患者为中心的结果和放射学愈合。需要进一步进行高质量的比较研究,以充分比较钻孔方式,明确界定非手术治疗后放射学愈合和以患者为中心的结果。