• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展指数模型的 γ 参数受内部梯度影响:在体模中的验证。

The γ parameter of the stretched-exponential model is influenced by internal gradients: validation in phantoms.

机构信息

Physics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Magn Reson. 2012 Mar;216:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmr.2011.12.023
PMID:22277782
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the image contrast that characterizes anomalous and non-gaussian diffusion images obtained using the stretched exponential model. This model is based on the introduction of the γ stretched parameter, which quantifies deviation from the mono-exponential decay of diffusion signal as a function of the b-value. To date, the biophysical substrate underpinning the contrast observed in γ maps, in other words, the biophysical interpretation of the γ parameter (or the fractional order derivative in space, β parameter) is still not fully understood, although it has already been applied to investigate both animal models and human brain. Due to the ability of γ maps to reflect additional microstructural information which cannot be obtained using diffusion procedures based on gaussian diffusion, some authors propose this parameter as a measure of diffusion heterogeneity or water compartmentalization in biological tissues. Based on our recent work we suggest here that the coupling between internal and diffusion gradients provide pseudo-superdiffusion effects which are quantified by the stretching exponential parameter γ. This means that the image contrast of Mγ maps reflects local magnetic susceptibility differences (Δχ(m)), thus highlighting better than T(2)(∗) contrast the interface between compartments characterized by Δχ(m). Thanks to this characteristic, Mγ imaging may represent an interesting tool to develop contrast-enhanced MRI for molecular imaging. The spectroscopic and imaging experiments (performed in controlled micro-beads dispersion) that are reported here, strongly suggest internal gradients, and as a consequence Δχ(m), to be an important factor in fully understanding the source of contrast in anomalous diffusion methods that are based on a stretched exponential model analysis of diffusion data obtained at varying gradient strengths g.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了使用扩展指数模型获得的异常和非高斯扩散图像的图像对比度。该模型基于引入γ扩展参数,该参数量化了扩散信号随 b 值变化的单指数衰减的偏离。迄今为止,γ图中观察到的对比度的生物物理基础,换句话说,γ参数(或空间中的分数阶导数,β参数)的生物物理解释尚不完全清楚,尽管它已经被应用于研究动物模型和人类大脑。由于γ图能够反映使用基于高斯扩散的扩散过程无法获得的附加微观结构信息,一些作者将该参数作为生物组织中扩散异质性或水隔室化的度量。基于我们最近的工作,我们在这里提出,内部梯度和扩散梯度之间的耦合提供了伪超扩散效应,该效应由扩展指数参数γ来量化。这意味着 Mγ 图的图像对比度反映了局部磁化率差异(Δχ(m)),因此比 T(2)(∗)对比度更好地突出了由 Δχ(m) 表征的隔室之间的界面。由于这一特性,Mγ 成像可能代表一种用于发展分子成像的对比增强 MRI 的有趣工具。本文报道的光谱和成像实验(在受控的微珠分散体中进行)强烈表明,内部梯度,因此是 Δχ(m),是充分理解基于扩展指数模型分析在不同梯度强度 g 下获得的扩散数据的异常扩散方法对比度来源的重要因素。

相似文献

1
The γ parameter of the stretched-exponential model is influenced by internal gradients: validation in phantoms.扩展指数模型的 γ 参数受内部梯度影响:在体模中的验证。
J Magn Reson. 2012 Mar;216:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
2
Spatio-temporal anomalous diffusion imaging: results in controlled phantoms and in excised human meningiomas.时空异常扩散成像:在对照模型和切除的人脑膜瘤中的结果。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr;31(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
3
Characterizing non-gaussian, high b-value diffusion in liver fibrosis: Stretched exponential and diffusional kurtosis modeling.肝脏纤维化中非高斯、高b值扩散的特征:拉伸指数和扩散峰度建模。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):827-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24234. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
The γ-parameter of anomalous diffusion quantified in human brain by MRI depends on local magnetic susceptibility differences.通过磁共振成像(MRI)在人脑中量化的反常扩散的γ参数取决于局部磁化率差异。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:619-631. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.051. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging: a brief practical review.非高斯扩散成像:简要实用综述。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec;29(10):1410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 20.
6
Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging.使用扩散峰度成像对人体中非高斯水扩散进行三维表征。
NMR Biomed. 2006 Apr;19(2):236-47. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1020.
7
Reduced encoding diffusion spectrum imaging implemented with a bi-Gaussian model.采用双高斯模型实现的简化编码扩散谱成像。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Oct;27(10):1415-24. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.922189.
8
Accuracy of q-space related parameters in MRI: simulations and phantom measurements.MRI中q空间相关参数的准确性:模拟与体模测量
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Nov;26(11):1437-47. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.907278.
9
Non-mono-exponential attenuation of water and N-acetyl aspartate signals due to diffusion in brain tissue.由于脑组织中的扩散,水和N-乙酰天门冬氨酸信号呈现非单指数衰减。
J Magn Reson. 1998 Mar;131(1):69-85. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1997.1313.
10
Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging.扩散峰度成像的最优化实验设计。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar;29(3):819-29. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2037915.

引用本文的文献

1
Acquisition Parameters Influence Diffusion Metrics Effectiveness in Probing Prostate Tumor and Age-Related Microstructure.采集参数对扩散指标探测前列腺肿瘤及与年龄相关微观结构的有效性有影响。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 20;13(5):860. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050860.
2
Transient Anomalous Diffusion MRI in Excised Mouse Spinal Cord: Comparison Among Different Diffusion Metrics and Validation With Histology.切除小鼠脊髓中的瞬态反常扩散磁共振成像:不同扩散指标的比较及组织学验证
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 15;15:797642. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.797642. eCollection 2021.
3
Influence of the size and curvedness of neural projections on the orientationally averaged diffusion MR signal.
神经突起的大小和弯曲度对取向平均扩散磁共振信号的影响。
Front Phys. 2018;6. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00017. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
Bayesian analysis of transverse signal decay with application to human brain.横向信号衰减的贝叶斯分析及其在人类大脑中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Sep;74(3):785-802. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25457. Epub 2014 Sep 19.