Magdolenova Zuzana, Bilaničová Dagmar, Pojana Giulio, Fjellsbø Lise M, Hudecova Alexandra, Hasplova Katarina, Marcomini Antonio, Dusinska Maria
Health Effects Laboratory, NILU, PO Box 100, 2027 Kjeller, Norway.
J Environ Monit. 2012 Feb;14(2):455-64. doi: 10.1039/c2em10746e. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
The published results on nanoparticles cytotoxicity and genotoxicity such as titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO(2) NPs) are inconsistent, and often conflicting and insufficient. Since different parameters may have impact on the toxicity results, there is need to lay stress on detailed characterization of NPs and the use of different testing conditions for assessment of NPs toxicity. In order to investigate whether dispersion procedures influence NP cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, we compared two protocols giving TiO(2) NP dispersions with different stability and agglomeration states. Detailed primary and secondary characteristics of both TiO(2) NP dispersions in culture media were carried out before toxicological testing; TK6 human lymphoblast cells, EUE human embryonic epithelial cells and Cos-1 monkey kidney fibroblasts were used to assess cytotoxicity (by trypan blue exclusion, proliferation activity and plating efficiency assays) and genotoxicity (by the comet assay). DNA strand breaks were detected by the alkaline comet assay. DNA oxidation lesions (especially 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, 8-oxoG) were measured with a modified comet assay including incubation with specific repair enzyme formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG). The TiO(2) NPs dispersion with large agglomerates (3 min sonication and no serum in stock solution) induced DNA damage in all three cell lines, while the TiO(2) NPs dispersed with agglomerates less than 200 nm (foetal serum in stock solution and sonication 15 min) had no effect on genotoxicity. An increased level of DNA oxidation lesions detected in Cos-1 and TK6 cells indicates that the leading mechanism by which TiO(2) NPs trigger genotoxicity is most likely oxidative stress. Our results show that the dispersion method used can influence the results of toxicity studies. Therefore at least two different dispersion procedures should be incorporated into assessment of cyto- and genotoxic effects of NPs. It is important, when assessing the hazard associated with NPs, to establish standard testing procedures and thorough strategies to consider the diverse conditions relevant to possible exposures.
已发表的关于纳米颗粒细胞毒性和遗传毒性的结果,如二氧化钛纳米颗粒(TiO₂ NPs),并不一致,而且常常相互矛盾且不充分。由于不同参数可能会影响毒性结果,因此需要强调对纳米颗粒进行详细表征,并使用不同的测试条件来评估纳米颗粒的毒性。为了研究分散程序是否会影响纳米颗粒的细胞毒性和遗传毒性,我们比较了两种制备具有不同稳定性和团聚状态的TiO₂ NP分散体的方案。在进行毒理学测试之前,对两种TiO₂ NP分散体在培养基中的详细一级和二级特征进行了测定;使用TK6人淋巴母细胞、EUE人胚胎上皮细胞和Cos-1猴肾成纤维细胞来评估细胞毒性(通过台盼蓝排斥法、增殖活性和接种效率测定)和遗传毒性(通过彗星试验)。通过碱性彗星试验检测DNA链断裂。使用改良的彗星试验,包括与特异性修复酶甲酰胺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶(FPG)孵育,来测量DNA氧化损伤(特别是8-氧代-7,8-二氢鸟嘌呤,8-oxoG)。具有大团聚体的TiO₂ NP分散体(超声处理3分钟且储备溶液中无血清)在所有三种细胞系中均诱导了DNA损伤,而团聚体小于200 nm的TiO₂ NP分散体(储备溶液中有胎牛血清且超声处理15分钟)对遗传毒性没有影响。在Cos-1和TK6细胞中检测到的DNA氧化损伤水平升高表明,TiO₂ NPs引发遗传毒性的主要机制很可能是氧化应激。我们的结果表明,所使用的分散方法会影响毒性研究的结果。因此,在评估纳米颗粒的细胞毒性和遗传毒性效应时,应至少纳入两种不同的分散程序。在评估与纳米颗粒相关的危害时,建立标准测试程序和全面策略以考虑与可能暴露相关的各种条件非常重要。