Suppr超能文献

使用加权自动分析的血细胞分类计数来区分脓毒症与非感染性全身炎症:重症监护感染评分(ICIS)。

Use of a weighted, automated analysis of the differential blood count to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation: the intensive care infection score (ICIS).

作者信息

Nierhaus Axel, Linssen Jo, Wichmann Dominic, Braune Stephan, Kluge Stefan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, University Witten/ Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012 Apr;11(2):109-15. doi: 10.2174/187152812800392841.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid and accurate diagnosis and immediate treatment of sepsis are of crucial importance. However, differentiating sepsis from Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is a difficult challenge. Many diagnostic approaches based on clinical chemistry surrogate markers have not improved the situation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ICIS score was established in a cohort of 70 consecutive patients with SIRS. The score includes five parameters involved in the early innate immune response: mature neutrophils count, immature neutrophils count, antibody-secreting cells count, detection of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages activation. The score can be provided in real-time without sample preparation and is independent from inter-observer variability.

RESULTS

Each ICIS score parameter itself is highly correlated with the occurrence of infection. A mean ICIS value of < 5 (lower cut-off level) indicated the absence of infection whereas the score did not fall below a value of 6 in infected patients throughout the observation time. The area under curve to detect infection for ICIS was found to be highest compared to CRP, LBP, EPO, IL-6 and TNF-α (AUC=0.851, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Cut-off values for ICIS as a marker of infection were defined by this pilot study. The superior discriminative power of ICIS compared to CRP, LBP, EPO, IL-6 and TNF-α is underlined by its high positive and negative predictive value, particularly within the first 48 hours (PPV=79.7%, NPV=74.5%). The ICIS score provides promising potential for reliably and swiftly discriminating sepsis from SIRS in the first critical hours.

摘要

引言

脓毒症的快速准确诊断及立即治疗至关重要。然而,区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)是一项艰巨挑战。许多基于临床化学替代标志物的诊断方法并未改善这一状况。

材料与方法

在一组连续70例SIRS患者中建立了ICIS评分。该评分包括早期固有免疫反应涉及的五个参数:成熟中性粒细胞计数、未成熟中性粒细胞计数、抗体分泌细胞计数、中性粒细胞检测以及单核细胞/巨噬细胞激活检测。该评分无需样本制备即可实时提供,且不受观察者间差异的影响。

结果

每个ICIS评分参数本身与感染的发生高度相关。平均ICIS值<5(较低临界值)表明无感染,而在整个观察期内,感染患者的评分未低于6分。与CRP、LBP、EPO、IL-6和TNF-α相比,ICIS检测感染的曲线下面积最高(AUC=0.851,P<0.0001)。

结论

本初步研究确定了ICIS作为感染标志物的临界值。ICIS与CRP、LBP、EPO、IL-6和TNF-α相比具有更高的鉴别能力,其高阳性和阴性预测价值尤其在最初48小时内得到体现(PPV=79.7%,NPV=74.5%)。ICIS评分在最初关键的几个小时内为可靠且迅速地区分脓毒症与SIRS提供了有前景的潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验