Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, P.O. Box 116450, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6450, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):2006-17. doi: 10.1021/es2043504. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
Fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) has been widely used to characterize dissolved organic matter (DOM). Characterization is based on the intensity and location of independent fluorescent components identified in models constructed from excitation-emission matrices (EEMs). Similar fluorescent components have been identified in PARAFAC studies across a wide range of systems; however, there is a lack of discussion regarding the consistency with which these similar components behave. The overall goal of this critical review is to compare results for PARAFAC studies published since the year 2000 which include one or more of three reoccurring humic-like components. Components are compared and characterized based on EEM location, characteristic ecosystems, and behavior in natural and engineered systems. This synthesis allows PARAFAC users to more confidently infer DOM characteristics based on identified components. Additionally, behavioral inconsistencies between similar components help elucidate DOM properties for which fluorescence spectroscopy with PARAFAC may be a weak predictive tool.
荧光光谱法与平行因子分析(PARAFAC)相结合已广泛用于表征溶解有机物(DOM)。表征是基于从激发-发射矩阵(EEM)构建的模型中识别出的独立荧光成分的强度和位置。在广泛的系统中,PARAFAC 研究已经确定了相似的荧光成分;然而,关于这些相似成分的行为一致性的讨论却很少。本批判性评论的总体目标是比较自 2000 年以来发表的 PARAFAC 研究的结果,这些研究包括一个或多个三个反复出现的类腐殖质成分。根据 EEM 位置、特征生态系统以及在自然和工程系统中的行为对成分进行比较和表征。这种综合使 PARAFAC 用户能够更有信心地根据已识别的成分推断 DOM 的特征。此外,相似成分之间的行为不一致性有助于阐明荧光光谱法与 PARAFAC 可能是一种弱预测工具的 DOM 特性。