Suppr超能文献

雷贝拉唑钠肠溶片联合胃黏膜保护剂对内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡愈合的影响:一项多中心、随机、前瞻性研究

Can rebamipide and proton pump inhibitor combination therapy promote the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers? A randomized, prospective, multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.004. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial.

SETTING

Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea.

PATIENTS

This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer.

INTERVENTION

PPI and rebamipide combination therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD.

RESULTS

The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481).

LIMITATIONS

Open-label study.

CONCLUSION

PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01167101.).

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后溃疡的最佳治疗持续时间和药物方案尚未达成共识。

目的

评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和瑞巴派特联合治疗与 PPI 单药治疗 ESD 后溃疡愈合的疗效。

设计

随机、前瞻性、对照研究;临床试验。

地点

韩国大学医学中心组的 5 家医院。

患者

本研究纳入 290 名接受 ESD 治疗胃腺瘤或早期胃癌的成年人(309 处病变)。

干预措施

PPI 和瑞巴派特联合治疗。

主要观察指标

ESD 后 4 周的溃疡愈合率。

结果

ESD 后 4 周时,PPI 和瑞巴派特联合治疗组的溃疡愈合率明显高于 PPI 单药组,全分析集(94.9%比 89.9%;P<0.0001)和符合方案集(94.5%比 91.2%;P=0.020)均如此。这种联合治疗是溃疡愈合率高的独立预测因素(调整后的优势比[OR] 5.572;95%置信区间[CI],2.615-11.876;P=0.014)。此外,联合治疗组的溃疡愈合质量优于 PPI 单药组(主要研究者:P=0.027;OR 1.949;95%CI,1.077-3.527;次要研究者:P=0.027;OR 1.933;95%CI,1.074-3.481)。

局限性

开放性研究。

结论

与 PPI 单药治疗相比,PPI 和瑞巴派特联合治疗在 ESD 后 4 周时具有更好的溃疡愈合率和溃疡愈合质量。(临床试验注册号:NCT01167101.)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验