Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, 71 Chou-Shan Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Mar;108:285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of feedstock collection and torrefaction pretreatment on the efficiency of a biomass co-firing system. Considering the transformation of existing municipal solid waste incinerators, several scenarios in which biomass supply chains depend on centralised pretreatment and transportation alternatives are presented. The cost, net energy output, and greenhouse gas effects of these scenarios were analysed using a spreadsheet model. Based on the Taoyuan County case in Taiwan, the mitigation costs of carbon emissions for rice straw and Pennisetum are 77.0 $/Mg CO(2) and 63.8 $/Mg CO(2), respectively. Results indicate that transporting feedstock from its source to the pretreatment and co-firing stations contributes the most to logistical costs for both straw and Pennisetum, regardless of whether torrefaction was adopted. Nonetheless, torrefaction requires more demonstrated cases at various scales to obtain the technical and economic data required for further analysis.
本研究旨在探讨原料收集和热解预处理对生物质混烧系统效率的影响。考虑到现有城市固体废物焚烧炉的改造,提出了几种生物质供应链依赖集中预处理和运输替代方案的情景。使用电子表格模型分析了这些方案的成本、净能源输出和温室气体效应。基于台湾桃园县的案例,水稻秸秆和狼尾草的碳减排缓解成本分别为 77.0 美元/MgCO2 和 63.8 美元/MgCO2。结果表明,无论是否采用热解,将原料从其来源运输到预处理和混烧站都会对秸秆和狼尾草的物流成本贡献最大。不过,热解需要在不同规模上进行更多的实例研究,以获取进一步分析所需的技术和经济数据。