• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于终末期心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的结局。

Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):241-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963991. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963991
PMID:22282104
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The HeartMate II (HMII) destination therapy (DT) trial demonstrated significant improvements in outcomes in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices compared with patients implanted with the pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE. The primary hypothesis of the current study is that trial patients enrolled after the initial data cohort would have better clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-one patients who underwent HMII for DT from May 2007 to March 2009 (Mid Trial [MT] group) were compared with the initial 133 HMII patients from March 2005 to May 2007 (Early Trial [ET] group). Patient entry criteria were the same during the 2 time periods. Survival, adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Compared with the ET group, patients in the MT group had reduced adverse event rates for bleeding requiring transfusions (1.66 versus 1.13 events per patient-year, P<0.001), sepsis (0.38 versus 0.27, P=0.025), device-related infections (0.47 versus 0.27, P<0.001), and hemorrhagic stroke (0.07 versus 0.03, P=0.01). Other event rates were similar between groups including ischemic stroke (0.06 versus 0.05 events per patient-year, P=0.57). Survival at 1 year in the MT group was 73% versus 68% in the ET group (P=0.21). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in deaths caused by hemorrhagic stroke (P=0.01). Quality of life improvements were significant in both the groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of DT therapy with the HMII is confirmed in subsequent trial patients, with improved adverse event rates and a strong trend for improvements in survival. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00121485.

摘要

背景

与植入搏动流 HeartMate XVE 的患者相比,HeartMate II(HMII)心脏移植治疗(DT)试验显示在连续流左心室辅助设备方面的结果有显著改善。本研究的主要假设是,在初始数据队列之后入组的试验患者会有更好的临床结局。

方法和结果

2007 年 5 月至 2009 年 3 月期间,281 例接受 HMII 心脏移植 DT 的患者(中期试验[MT]组)与 2005 年 3 月至 2007 年 5 月期间的 133 例初始 HMII 患者(早期试验[ET]组)进行了比较。在这两个时期,患者入组标准相同。比较两组之间的生存、不良事件和生活质量。两组之间的基线特征相似。与 ET 组相比,MT 组的出血需要输血的不良事件发生率较低(1.66 比 1.13 例患者-年,P<0.001)、败血症(0.38 比 0.27,P=0.025)、器械相关感染(0.47 比 0.27,P<0.001)和出血性卒中(0.07 比 0.03,P=0.01)。两组其他事件发生率相似,包括缺血性卒中(0.06 比 0.05 例患者-年,P=0.57)。MT 组的 1 年生存率为 73%,ET 组为 68%(P=0.21)。此外,出血性卒中引起的死亡率显著降低(P=0.01)。两组的生活质量均有显著改善(P<0.001)。

结论

HMII 心脏移植 DT 的治疗益处在随后的试验患者中得到证实,不良事件发生率降低,生存改善趋势明显。临床试验注册-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00121485。

相似文献

1
Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.用于终末期心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):241-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963991. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
2
Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置进行长期“目标”治疗以改善治疗效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1353-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.124.
3
Differential impact on post-transplant outcomes between pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.搏动式和连续血流左心室辅助装置对移植后结果的影响差异。
Clin Transplant. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):E390-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01433.x. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
5
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
6
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.左心室辅助装置植入作为终末期治疗在 REMATCH 时代后的结局:对患者选择的启示。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
Risk assessment for continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: does the destination therapy risk score work? An analysis of over 1,000 patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置的风险评估:目标治疗风险评分是否有效?对超过 1000 名患者的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation.经心室内连续流离心式血泵在等待心脏移植患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 26;125(25):3191-200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058412. Epub 2012 May 22.
9
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:对生存率的新审视。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.04.044.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.连续血流左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭治疗的成本效果分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Jan;5(1):10-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962951. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
History and Application of Mechanical Assist Devices as a Bridge to Heart Transplant: A Review and Perspectives in Brazil.作为心脏移植桥梁的机械辅助装置的历史与应用:巴西的综述与展望
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug 14;40(6). doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2025-0906.
2
Comparative Technological Analysis of Durability and Reliability in Axial-Flow Pump Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs).轴流泵式左心室辅助装置(LVADs)耐久性和可靠性的比较技术分析
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s13239-025-00778-x.
3
Pregnancy with a Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Narrative Review.
植入左心室辅助装置后的妊娠:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2025 Jan 1;28(1):10-16. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_136_24. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
4
Hemocompatibility and biophysical interface of left ventricular assist devices and total artificial hearts.左心室辅助装置和全人工心脏的血液相容性和生物物理界面。
Blood. 2024 Feb 22;143(8):661-672. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018096.
5
Improving cardiovascular outcomes for patients with heart failure in sub-Saharan Africa: conference proceedings of the 2022 Nigerian Cardiovascular Symposium.改善撒哈拉以南非洲地区心力衰竭患者的心血管结局:2022 年尼日利亚心血管研讨会会议记录。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023;34(2):121-128. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2023-016. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
von Willebrand Factor and Angiopoietin-2 are Sensitive Biomarkers of Pulsatility in Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Device Patients.血管性血友病因子和血管生成素 2 是连续流心室辅助装置患者脉动性的敏感生物标志物。
ASAIO J. 2023 Jun 1;69(6):569-575. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001886. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
7
Controversies and challenges of coil embolization for intracranial aneurysm in a continuous-flow LVAD implanted patient: A case report.持续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术的争议与挑战:一例报告
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Jan 27;14:34. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1101_2022. eCollection 2023.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Primer For the General Cardiologist.左心室辅助装置:心内科医生入门指南。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027251. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027251. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
9
How does age affect outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation: results from the PCHF-VAD registry.年龄如何影响左心室辅助装置植入后的结果:来自 PCHF-VAD 登记处的结果。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):884-894. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14247. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
10
Rates and types of infections in left ventricular assist device recipients: A scoping review.左心室辅助装置接受者的感染率及感染类型:一项范围综述
JTCVS Open. 2021 Aug 12;8:405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.08.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.