St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(7):1005-10. doi: 10.2174/138161212799436511.
Despite the attractiveness of a vaccination strategy for the treatment of high blood pressure, and many decades of research, attempts to translate this strategy to hypertension management have been unsuccessful. Immunization against components of the renin angiotensin system offers the prospect of improved long-term control of hypertension because efficacy does not require daily compliance with oral medication. Moreover, such a strategy may provide therapeutic benefits beyond blood pressure control, such as improved prevention and treatment of heart failure, and cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal disease. However, despite these potential advantages, there are a number of concerns about the safety and efficacy of this approach. Renin immunization demonstrated effective blood pressure reduction in animal models of hypertension but was accompanied by autoimmune disease of the kidney. Moreover, there are theoretical arguments that angiotensin immunization may have limited effectiveness and clinical studies confirmed these limitations. Vaccination against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor is another possible approach but has yet to undergo clinical evaluation. Thus, the role of vaccination against renin angiotensin system components in hypertension management remains to be established.
尽管针对高血压的疫苗接种策略具有吸引力,而且已经进行了数十年的研究,但将这一策略转化为高血压管理的尝试尚未成功。针对肾素-血管紧张素系统成分的免疫接种提供了改善高血压长期控制的前景,因为其疗效不需要每日服用口服药物。此外,这种策略可能提供除血压控制之外的治疗益处,例如改善心力衰竭以及心血管、脑血管和肾脏疾病的预防和治疗。然而,尽管有这些潜在的优势,但人们对这种方法的安全性和有效性仍存在一些担忧。肾素免疫接种在高血压动物模型中显示出有效的降压作用,但伴随着肾脏自身免疫性疾病。此外,还有理论上的观点认为血管紧张素免疫接种的效果可能有限,临床研究证实了这些局限性。针对血管紧张素 II 型 1 型受体的疫苗接种是另一种可能的方法,但尚未进行临床评估。因此,针对肾素-血管紧张素系统成分的疫苗接种在高血压管理中的作用仍有待确定。