• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自攻型和自钻型正畸微种植体的初期稳定性和组织学骨-种植体接触。

Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Feb;141(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.020
PMID:22284286
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary stability and the histomorphometric measurements of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants and the correlations between factors related to host, implant, and measuring technique.

METHODS

Seventy-two self-drilling and self-tapping implants were placed into bovine iliac crest blocks after computed tomography assessments. Insertion torque values, subjective assessments of stability, and Periotest (Medizintecknik Gulden, Modautal, Germany) measurements were performed for each implant. Twelve specimens of each group were assigned to histologic and histomorphometric assessments.

RESULTS

The differences between insertion torque values, most Periotest values, and subjective assessments of stability scores were insignificant (P >0.05). The bone-implant contact percentage of the self-drilling group (87.60%) was higher than that of the self-tapping group (80.73%) (P <0.05). Positive correlations were found between insertion torque value, cortical bone thickness, and density in both groups (P <0.05). Negative correlations between insertion torque values and Periotest values were mostly observed in the self-drilling group (P <0.05). Positive correlations were found between bone-implant contact percentages, cortical bone densities, and insertion torque values in both groups (P <0.05). The differences between insertion torque values and corresponding subjective assessments of stability scores were different in both groups (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in insertion torque values, Periotest values, and subjective assessments of stability scores of self-drilling and self-tapping implants were insignificant. Self-drilling implants had higher bone-implant contact percentages than did self-tapping implants. Significant correlations were found between parameters influencing the primary stability of the implants.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估自攻自钻式正畸微种植体的初期稳定性和组织学测量值,并分析与宿主、种植体和测量技术相关的因素之间的相关性。

方法

通过计算机断层扫描评估后,将 72 个自攻自钻式和自攻式种植体植入牛髂嵴块中。对每个种植体进行插入扭矩值、稳定性主观评估和 Periotest(德国 Medizintecknik Gulden,Modautal)测量。每组 12 个标本用于组织学和组织形态学评估。

结果

插入扭矩值、大多数 Periotest 值和稳定性主观评估得分之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。自攻组的骨-种植体接触率(87.60%)高于自攻组(80.73%)(P<0.05)。两组中插入扭矩值与皮质骨厚度和密度均呈正相关(P<0.05)。自攻组中插入扭矩值与 Periotest 值之间主要呈负相关(P<0.05)。两组中骨-种植体接触率、皮质骨密度和插入扭矩值之间呈正相关(P<0.05)。两组中插入扭矩值与相应稳定性主观评估得分之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

自攻自钻式和自攻式种植体的插入扭矩值、Periotest 值和稳定性主观评估得分差异无统计学意义。自攻式种植体的骨-种植体接触率高于自攻式种植体。影响种植体初期稳定性的参数之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.自攻型和自钻型正畸微种植体的初期稳定性和组织学骨-种植体接触。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Feb;141(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.020.
2
Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.犬用自攻自钻正畸微种植体的生物力学与组织学比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.023.
3
Cortical bone strains around straight and angulated immediate orthodontic microimplants: a pilot study.皮质骨应变周围直和成角即刻正畸微种植体:一项初步研究。
Implant Dent. 2013 Apr;22(2):133-7. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31827b96c2.
4
Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.骨质量、种植体类型和种植体部位准备对用于正畸锚固的微型种植体植入扭矩的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(7):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.08.008. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
5
Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.自攻式正畸微种植体即刻加载的潜力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.030.
6
[Biomechanical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic micro-implants].[自攻自钻正畸微种植体的生物力学比较]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;42(10):605-7.
7
Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.不同微种植体设计对初级稳定性的骨结构影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jan;147(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.09.011.
8
Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants: an animal study of insertion torque and displacement under lateral loading.自攻型与自钻型正畸微型种植体的比较:侧向加载下植入扭矩和位移的动物研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):404-11.
9
Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.绵羊体内正畸微种植体植入后的骨反应的微计算机断层分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1233-40.
10
Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.在松质骨中,手术技术、种植体形状和直径对初期稳定性的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Dec;37(12):900-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02117.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Anchorage and Stability of Orthodontic Mini Implants in Relation to Length and Types of Implants.正畸微型种植体的锚固与稳定性:与种植体长度和类型的关系
Cureus. 2024 Nov 5;16(11):e73056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73056. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Evaluation of Two Mini-implant Lengths in the Infrazygomatic Crest Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial.颧突区域两种微型种植体长度的评估:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):399-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789015. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
Accuracy of Microimplant Placement Using a 3D Guide Plate for Orthodontic Anchorage.
使用三维导板进行正畸支抗微种植体植入的准确性
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2023 Jun 26;2023:9060046. doi: 10.1155/2023/9060046. eCollection 2023.
4
Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of a novel miniscrew made of ZrNiCuAl bulk metallic glass for orthodontic anchorage.一种新型 ZrNiCuAl 块状金属玻璃微螺钉的力学性能和生物相容性及其在正畸支抗中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 21;13(1):3038. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30102-3.
5
Thread shape, cortical bone thickness, and magnitude and distribution of stress caused by the loading of orthodontic miniscrews: finite element analysis.正畸微螺钉加载引起的螺纹形状、皮质骨厚度及应力大小和分布的有限元分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16662-w.
6
Mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrew depends on a thread shape.正畸微螺钉的机械稳定性取决于螺纹形状。
J Dent Sci. 2022 Jul;17(3):1244-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Effect of miniscrew insertion angle in the maxillary buccal plate on its clinical survival: a randomized clinical trial.微型种植体植入上颌颊侧骨板角度对其临床存留率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Prog Orthod. 2021 Aug 2;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00370-8.
8
Insertion torque values and success rates for paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants : A retrospective study.正畸微型种植体旁正中植入的插入扭矩值和成功率:一项回顾性研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Mar;79(2):109-115. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0120-x. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Influence of Screw Length and Bone Thickness on the Stability of Temporary Implants.螺钉长度和骨厚度对临时种植体稳定性的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2015 Sep 23;8(9):6558-6569. doi: 10.3390/ma8095322.
10
Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation.体内愈合过程中骨-植入物界面材料特性变化的监测:一项粘弹性研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1945607. doi: 10.1155/2017/1945607. Epub 2017 Mar 8.