The Wallenberg Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Clinical Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Apr;221(2):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.11.041. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
We have previously shown that different forms of stress have distinctive effects on atherogenesis in mice. We showed that social stress increase atherosclerosis in ApoE(-/-) mice, while more physical forms of stress do not. Here we evaluated the effect of social disruption (SDR) stress on atherogenesis and evaluated cytokine release after SDR-stress and five more physical stressors.
Male ApoE(-/-) mice were exposed to SDR-stress during 12 weeks, and atherosclerotic plaque area was assessed in aorta, aortic root and innominate artery. Further, male C57BL/6 mice were exposed to SDR-stress or five physical stressors, and cytokine and corticosterone levels were analyzed in plasma/serum samples immediately after stress.
We found a correlation between the level of SDR-stress and atherosclerotic plaque area in aorta and a numerical increased plaque area in aortic root. SDR stress did not affect histological features of plaque composition. However, SDR-stress increased levels of corticosterone, IL-6 and CXCL1. Plasma corticosterone increased for all five physical stressors, but IL-6 and CXCL1 only increased in the group exposed to restraint combined with rat odor.
These findings suggest that SDR-stress is indeed atherogenic, in contrast to our previous results using the physical stressors. A possible explanation to this difference is that SDR-stress, but not physical stressors, leads to release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and CXCL1.
我们之前已经表明,不同形式的压力对小鼠动脉粥样硬化形成有独特的影响。我们发现社会压力会增加 ApoE(-/-) 小鼠的动脉粥样硬化,而更多的物理形式的压力则不会。在这里,我们评估了社会扰乱(SDR)压力对动脉粥样硬化形成的影响,并评估了 SDR 压力和另外五种物理应激源后的细胞因子释放。
雄性 ApoE(-/-) 小鼠在 12 周内暴露于 SDR 应激下,评估主动脉、主动脉根部和无名动脉中的动脉粥样硬化斑块面积。此外,雄性 C57BL/6 小鼠暴露于 SDR 应激或五种物理应激源下,在应激后立即分析血浆/血清样本中的细胞因子和皮质酮水平。
我们发现 SDR 应激水平与主动脉中的动脉粥样硬化斑块面积之间存在相关性,并且主动脉根部的斑块面积有数值上的增加。SDR 应激不影响斑块组成的组织学特征。然而,SDR 应激增加了皮质酮、IL-6 和 CXCL1 的水平。所有五种物理应激源都会增加血浆皮质酮,但只有在暴露于束缚和大鼠气味的组中才会增加 IL-6 和 CXCL1。
这些发现表明,SDR 应激确实是动脉粥样硬化的致病因素,与我们之前使用物理应激源的结果相反。造成这种差异的一种可能解释是,SDR 应激会导致促炎细胞因子 IL-6 和 CXCL1 的释放,而不是物理应激源。