CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Apr;46(4):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
Recent studies examining the relationship between depression and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes have yielded mixed findings. One explanation may lie in the heterogeneity of depression. Therefore, we examined whether distinct features of depression were differentially associated with suboptimal glycemic control. Cross-sectional baseline data from a dynamic cohort study of primary care patients with type 2 diabetes from the Eindhoven region, The Netherlands, were analyzed. A total of 5772 individuals completed baseline measurements of demographic, clinical, lifestyle and psychological factors between 2005 and 2009. The Edinburgh Depression Scale was used to assess symptoms of depressed mood, anhedonia and anxiety. Suboptimal glycemic control was defined as HbA(1c) values ≥7%, with 29.8% of the sample (n=1718) scoring above this cut-off. In univariate logistic regression analyses, anhedonia was significantly associated with suboptimal glycemic control (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52), while both depressed mood (OR 1.04, 0.88-1.22) and anxiety (OR 0.99, 0.83-1.19) were not. The association between anhedonia and glycemic control remained after adjustment for the other depression measures (OR 1.33, 1.11-1.59). Alcohol consumption and physical activity met criteria for mediation, but did not attenuate the association between anhedonia and glycemic control by more than 5%. Although diabetes duration was identified as a confounder and controlled for, the association was still significant (OR 1.20, 1.01-1.43). Studying different symptoms of depression, in particular anhedonia, may add to a better understanding of the relationship between depression and glycemic control.
最近的研究检查了 2 型糖尿病患者的抑郁与糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))浓度之间的关系,结果发现结果不一致。一种解释可能在于抑郁的异质性。因此,我们研究了不同的抑郁特征是否与血糖控制不佳有差异。对荷兰埃因霍温地区初级保健 2 型糖尿病患者的动态队列研究的横断面基线数据进行了分析。共有 5772 人在 2005 年至 2009 年期间完成了人口统计学、临床、生活方式和心理因素的基线测量。使用爱丁堡抑郁量表评估心境低落、快感缺失和焦虑的抑郁症状。血糖控制不佳定义为 HbA(1c)值≥7%,样本中有 29.8%(n=1718)的分数高于此截止值。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,快感缺失与血糖控制不佳显著相关(OR 1.29,95%CI 1.09-1.52),而心境低落(OR 1.04,0.88-1.22)和焦虑(OR 0.99,0.83-1.19)则不然。在调整了其他抑郁测量值后,快感缺失与血糖控制之间的关系仍然存在(OR 1.33,1.11-1.59)。酒精消费和体育活动符合中介标准,但并没有使快感缺失与血糖控制之间的关系减弱超过 5%。尽管糖尿病持续时间被确定为混杂因素并进行了控制,但该关联仍然显著(OR 1.20,1.01-1.43)。研究不同的抑郁症状,特别是快感缺失,可能有助于更好地理解抑郁与血糖控制之间的关系。