Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗的临床争议

Clinical controversies surrounding thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kline E M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1990 Nov;19(6):596-601.

PMID:2228648
Abstract

The treatment of acute myocardial infarction has changed tremendously in the past decade because thrombolytic therapy has become the treatment of choice for the patient with acute myocardial infarction. Although many issues have been resolved, several controversial issues remain unresolved. This article addresses thrombolytic agents in terms of their superiority in achieving infarct vessel patency and mortality reduction as well as the role of thrombolysis in patients who present with chest pain of greater than 6 hours' duration, who are elderly, and who have an inferior infarction.

摘要

在过去十年中,急性心肌梗死的治疗发生了巨大变化,因为溶栓治疗已成为急性心肌梗死患者的首选治疗方法。尽管许多问题已经得到解决,但仍有几个有争议的问题尚未解决。本文讨论了溶栓药物在实现梗死血管通畅和降低死亡率方面的优越性,以及溶栓在胸痛持续时间超过6小时、老年患者和下壁梗死患者中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验