Suppr超能文献

[急性心肌梗死后的血运重建措施]

[Revascularization measures after acute myocardial infarct].

作者信息

Erbel R, Spiecker M, Rupprecht H J, Darius H, Görge G, Haude M, Dietz U, Meyer J

机构信息

Abteilung Kardiologie, Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1993;82 Suppl 2:157-69.

PMID:8328196
Abstract

Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction reduces mortality significantly. This acute effect seems to be counterbalanced by the increased mortality during follow-up whether or not the patient has been treated with thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis seems to be a first step in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Revascularization procedures are able to improve patient prognosis. Long-term follow-up demonstrated this fact whether or not PTCA was performed in the acute setting or on an elective basis. The 6-year survival was 80%. This survival rate was higher for patients who underwent PTCA than for those who were not undergoing PTCA and those who had no reperfusion of the coronary artery. The best prognosis was found for patients with coronary bypass surgery, indicating that revascularization should be the aim of treatment. The 6-year survival rate was found to be 92% and is thus in the range of patients with coronary artery disease. Acute infarct PTCA is limited to patients with cardiogenic shock and is particularly useful for patients with occlusion of the main stem of the left coronary artery. Acute infarct PTCA is also recommended in patients with contraindications for thrombolytic therapy, when interventions can be performed rapidly, when a large infarct size is present and infarct time is less than 4 hours. Whether or not RESCUE-PTCA should be recommended is under investigation. Patients with an open coronary artery have a better prognosis than patients with occluded coronary arteries, but during the acute stage, spontaneous recanalization is present in many patients. The RESCUE study will address this question. Elective PTCA is recommended as well as coronary bypass surgery, when successful reperfusion is achieved and one-or two-vessel disease is present or there is a two- or three-vessel disease or main stem involvement, respectively. In patients with coronary lesions less than 70% conservative treatment is useful. The guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association are strongly recommended.

摘要

急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗可显著降低死亡率。无论患者是否接受溶栓治疗,这种急性效应似乎都被随访期间死亡率的增加所抵消。溶栓似乎是急性心肌梗死治疗的第一步。血运重建程序能够改善患者预后。长期随访证明了这一事实,无论PTCA是在急性期进行还是择期进行。6年生存率为80%。接受PTCA的患者的生存率高于未接受PTCA以及未进行冠状动脉再灌注的患者。冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的预后最佳,这表明血运重建应是治疗的目标。发现6年生存率为92%,因此处于冠心病患者的范围内。急性梗死PTCA仅限于心源性休克患者,对左冠状动脉主干闭塞的患者尤为有用。对于有溶栓治疗禁忌证、能够迅速进行干预、存在大面积梗死且梗死时间小于4小时的患者,也推荐进行急性梗死PTCA。是否应推荐RESCUE-PTCA正在研究中。冠状动脉通畅的患者比冠状动脉闭塞的患者预后更好,但在急性期,许多患者存在自发再通。RESCUE研究将解决这个问题。当成功实现再灌注且分别存在单支或双支血管病变、双支或三支血管病变或主干受累时,推荐进行择期PTCA以及冠状动脉搭桥手术。对于冠状动脉病变小于70%的患者,保守治疗是有用的。强烈推荐美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会的指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验